<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945835#M584781</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, this document is useful for upgrading, but not for my question.&lt;BR /&gt;I can find upgrade paths here, but my essential question is:&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to have a deployment with "mixed" Versions:&amp;nbsp;ISE 2.7 and ISE 3.3 or ISE 3.0 and ISE 3.3.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stephan.ochs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-23T08:10:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945801#M584779</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Next year we need to migrate our deployment (2 ISE 2.7 on SNS-3515) to new hardware and newest version.&lt;BR /&gt;My plan is to install new hardware, add it to the existing deployment and remove the old ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was searching for some information about compatibility between ISE versions within a deployment, but didn't find anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am nearly sure 2.7 won't be possible with 3.3.&lt;BR /&gt;The maximum version for SNS-3515 is 3.0.&lt;BR /&gt;So would it be possible to update our existing ISE deployment to 3.0, add new ISE with 3.3 and then remove the 3.0?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945801#M584779</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephan.ochs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T07:21:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945827#M584780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- You may find this document useful :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-3/upgrade_guide/Upgrade_Journey/PDF/b_ise_upgrade_guide_3_3_pdf.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-3/upgrade_guide/Upgrade_Journey/PDF/b_ise_upgrade_guide_3_3_pdf.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 07:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945827#M584780</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T07:57:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945835#M584781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, this document is useful for upgrading, but not for my question.&lt;BR /&gt;I can find upgrade paths here, but my essential question is:&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to have a deployment with "mixed" Versions:&amp;nbsp;ISE 2.7 and ISE 3.3 or ISE 3.0 and ISE 3.3.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945835#M584781</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephan.ochs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T08:10:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945846#M584782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - It isn't ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:22:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945846#M584782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T08:22:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945852#M584783</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It isn't for 2.7/3.3?&lt;BR /&gt;For 3.0/3.3 it should be possible.&lt;BR /&gt;When upgrading a deployment from 3.0 to 3.3 (possible as written in upgrade guide) there's the situation, that I have some 3.0 and 3.3 mixed in the deployment.&lt;BR /&gt;Right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4945852#M584783</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephan.ochs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T08:26:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946256#M584784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ALL nodes in a given ISE deployment must be the same major and minor release. This applies for all versions of ISE ever.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Patch versions can vary, but it's not recommended to run that way for an extended period - only during deployment of patches to the next level,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946256#M584784</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T16:14:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946262#M584785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Best is to restore a backup to the new appliance on the new code. Test it with a demo VM to make sure, but we did this going for 3595s to 3765s 2-node deployments. We basically shut the primary down, brought the new one up on the new code/patch and restored the backup. Then did the secondary and joined it to the first in HA. We went from 2.6 to 3.1 this way without issues.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946262#M584785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dustin Anderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-23T16:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE deployment - different versions for migration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946617#M584804</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help. I was hoping there was a way to do a soft migration. We will probably do it via backup/restore.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 06:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-deployment-different-versions-for-migration/m-p/4946617#M584804</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephan.ochs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-24T06:11:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

