<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE 2.7 Radius suppression and CTS in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4950954#M584916</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're using Cisco Trustsec in our Branch Office and currently investigating an interesting issue - it looks like Radius Suppression does not work for endpoints connected to NADs onboarded for CTS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a result we see all of the failed attempts (MAB, for example) for every endpoint where as having radius suppression turned on:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201213i992E4D69B6F7C333/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" alt="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For all of them we see expected reject:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201214iBCBBE2691BE5BF8D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" alt="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Radius Suppression Settings:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201215i3A7BF59A4EB5867A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" alt="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've collected some debugs and it looks like CTS has some impact here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,466 DEBUG [Thread-250][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e1a3700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression isRejectEndpoint: EndpointID=6C:24:08:8A:E9:26,ClientSuppression.cpp:424&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,466 DEBUG [Thread-250][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e1a3700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression endpoint is not in the misconfigured list,ClientSuppression.cpp:468&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,523 DEBUG [Thread-211][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- Radius,DEBUG,0x7f348e5a7700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,user=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,FAILED ATTEMPT - AccessReject detected.,RadiusRequestFlow.cpp:758&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,523 DEBUG [Thread-211][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e5a7700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,user=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression OnFailure: prevent client suppression for CTS client endpoint,ClientSuppression.cpp:148&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, i did not find any input on such behavior in documentation. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kefear</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-30T15:36:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE 2.7 Radius suppression and CTS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4950954#M584916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're using Cisco Trustsec in our Branch Office and currently investigating an interesting issue - it looks like Radius Suppression does not work for endpoints connected to NADs onboarded for CTS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a result we see all of the failed attempts (MAB, for example) for every endpoint where as having radius suppression turned on:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201213i992E4D69B6F7C333/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" alt="kefear_0-1698679929406.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For all of them we see expected reject:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201214iBCBBE2691BE5BF8D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" alt="kefear_1-1698679966628.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Radius Suppression Settings:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/201215i3A7BF59A4EB5867A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" alt="kefear_2-1698680053522.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've collected some debugs and it looks like CTS has some impact here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,466 DEBUG [Thread-250][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e1a3700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression isRejectEndpoint: EndpointID=6C:24:08:8A:E9:26,ClientSuppression.cpp:424&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,466 DEBUG [Thread-250][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e1a3700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression endpoint is not in the misconfigured list,ClientSuppression.cpp:468&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,523 DEBUG [Thread-211][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- Radius,DEBUG,0x7f348e5a7700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,user=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,FAILED ATTEMPT - AccessReject detected.,RadiusRequestFlow.cpp:758&lt;BR /&gt;2023-10-30 22:17:24,523 DEBUG [Thread-211][] cisco.cpm.prrt.impl.PrRTLoggerImpl -:::::- ClientSuppression,DEBUG,0x7f348e5a7700,cntx=0000106875,sesn=ise-1n2/488037056/2462,CPMSessionID=6704840A0001C45A35C19954,user=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,CallingStationID=6C-24-08-8A-E9-26,FramedIPAddress=10.132.74.148,ClientSuppression OnFailure: prevent client suppression for CTS client endpoint,ClientSuppression.cpp:148&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, i did not find any input on such behavior in documentation. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4950954#M584916</guid>
      <dc:creator>kefear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-30T15:36:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.7 Radius suppression and CTS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4952850#M584959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version of ISE is this? You might want to open a TAC case. I agree with you - I don't see why CTS should make any difference with respect to the suppression functionality in ISE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 20:24:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4952850#M584959</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-02T20:24:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE 2.7 Radius suppression and CTS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4954703#M585037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently we're on&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.7.0.356 Patch 6. Agree with you, we'll definitely open SR to investigate this&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 05:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-2-7-radius-suppression-and-cts/m-p/4954703#M585037</guid>
      <dc:creator>kefear</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-07T05:55:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

