<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ISE Cluster Design (across several countries) in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968456#M585445</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're considering deploying ISE VMs in Azure, you should also be aware of this issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/996062/azure-drops-my-udp-fragmentated-packets-when-they" target="_blank"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/996062/azure-drops-my-udp-fragmentated-packets-when-they&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been that MS is now refusing to enable this feature for customers, which will break EAP-TLS due to the normal fragmentation that happens with the large payload required for certificates. MS suggests dropping the MTU to 1300 on the network devices as a workaround, but that may not be suitable for all environments (like Meraki or other cloud-managed devices).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would highly recommend testing your use cases extensively before moving to Azure. If you have a hybrid cloud environment, you might also consider deploying ISE in AWS as they do not have this issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 21:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-29T21:55:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE Cluster Design (across several countries)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968343#M585441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looking for some design guides for an ISE deployment using Azure across multiple counties.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any assistance would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968343#M585441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay233</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T17:02:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE Cluster Design (across several countries)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968361#M585442</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check below guides can help you :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/performance_and_scalability/b_ise_perf_and_scale.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/performance_and_scalability/b_ise_perf_and_scale.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Azure specific :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/ISE_on_Cloud/b_ISEonCloud/m_ISEonAzureServices.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/ISE_on_Cloud/b_ISEonCloud/m_ISEonAzureServices.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqGmQBgQJw0" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqGmQBgQJw0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ1SYN1LbeQ" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZ1SYN1LbeQ&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968361#M585442</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T17:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE Cluster Design (across several countries)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968456#M585445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're considering deploying ISE VMs in Azure, you should also be aware of this issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/996062/azure-drops-my-udp-fragmentated-packets-when-they" target="_blank"&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/996062/azure-drops-my-udp-fragmentated-packets-when-they&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've been that MS is now refusing to enable this feature for customers, which will break EAP-TLS due to the normal fragmentation that happens with the large payload required for certificates. MS suggests dropping the MTU to 1300 on the network devices as a workaround, but that may not be suitable for all environments (like Meraki or other cloud-managed devices).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would highly recommend testing your use cases extensively before moving to Azure. If you have a hybrid cloud environment, you might also consider deploying ISE in AWS as they do not have this issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 21:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4968456#M585445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T21:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE Cluster Design (across several countries)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4973910#M585615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Greg,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Following on from your reply regarding EAP-TLS challenges using Azure, which BTW was very helpful.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have 1 forest with 14 child domains spread across the globe, what would be the correct approach for ISE in this instance? Hybrid with PAN, SPAN and M&amp;amp;T's in Azure having on-prem PSN VM/appliances depending on client count per child domain?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would this alter if we turned to Meraki cloud as opposed to traditional NAD placements? Would this approach just be ISE cloud based with all personas in the Azure?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 09:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-cluster-design-across-several-countries/m-p/4973910#M585615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay233</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-08T09:06:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

