<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ISE - ANC leveraging integrated AMP - Isolation in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5103939#M589411</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This might be a question also to the Cisco TAC. I don't have AMP integration and I think one needs that integration to populate the ISE RADIUS Dictionary. If ISE Policy Set Authorization conditions are based on what is contained in the Dictionary. Have a look around in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Policy -&amp;gt; Policy Elements &amp;gt; Dictionaries &amp;gt; System&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; and explore any folders regarding ANC/AMP etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 23:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-13T23:54:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ISE - ANC leveraging integrated AMP - Isolation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5054756#M588529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have integrated Cisco ISE and AMP with intention to leverage threat centric data in authorization rules.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I can see threat centric data and compromised endpoint&amp;nbsp;within the ISE after executing false-exploit, like status "Painful", etc. but I don't see any attributes to leverage this in authorization policy.&lt;BR /&gt;I'm able to trigger manual ANC based on this event, which is okay, but I need automated response and I thought this will work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My idea is (for example): Endpoint is being exploited and has Cisco AMP installed, Cisco AMP sends this threat centric data to ISE, ISE has authorization policy says "if threat level = painful &amp;amp; endpoint in Admin Lan" Endpoint will be assigned to quarantine VLAN or ANC will be triggered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My problem is that I don't see attributes above as threat level = painful or anything related to this AMP threat centric data that I can utilize in authorization policies to Isolate automatically.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5054756#M588529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Script Kiddie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-02T07:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE - ANC leveraging integrated AMP - Isolation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5103939#M589411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This might be a question also to the Cisco TAC. I don't have AMP integration and I think one needs that integration to populate the ISE RADIUS Dictionary. If ISE Policy Set Authorization conditions are based on what is contained in the Dictionary. Have a look around in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Policy -&amp;gt; Policy Elements &amp;gt; Dictionaries &amp;gt; System&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; and explore any folders regarding ANC/AMP etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 23:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5103939#M589411</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-13T23:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ISE - ANC leveraging integrated AMP - Isolation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5103970#M589412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The following list of Dictionaries/Attributes was shared as a reference for the &lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUwEuB6NlxU" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;ISE Webinar on the ISE Threat Centric NAC Service&lt;/A&gt;. These are the only attributes that can be used within ISE policies. If you have not done so already, I would suggest reviewing that Webinar for more information on the capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="Screenshot 2024-05-14 at 12.08.52 PM.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/218256i9D9D731693DD7C5A/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screenshot 2024-05-14 at 12.08.52 PM.png" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-14 at 12.08.52 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 02:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/cisco-ise-anc-leveraging-integrated-amp-isolation/m-p/5103970#M589412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Greg Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-14T02:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

