<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Timezone Configuration in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5149164#M590810</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; - FYI :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ntp-servers-and-time-zones-configuration-on-cisco-ise-2-7-large/m-p/4435964#M568555" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ntp-servers-and-time-zones-configuration-on-cisco-ise-2-7-large/m-p/4435964#M568555&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;and or I would stick to&lt;STRONG&gt; UTC&lt;/STRONG&gt; ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-23T16:09:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Timezone Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5149148#M590809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am standing up a brand new distributed ISE deployment using SNS appliances. I have 8 appliances in total: (2x PAN, 2x MON, 4x PSN). The question I have is about what timezone I should configure the devices for. The devices will physically reside in EDT and CDT as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary Admin: EDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondary Admin: CDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary Mon: EDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondary Mon: CDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PSNx2: EDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PSNx2: CDT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the PANs and MONs must be configured for the same time zone regardless of where they are physically located, correct? While the PSNs can be configured for any timezone independently?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a case to configure my whole deployment for UTC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help on best practices is highly appreciated. Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:38:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5149148#M590809</guid>
      <dc:creator>craddockchristopher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-23T15:38:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Timezone Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5149164#M590810</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; - FYI :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ntp-servers-and-time-zones-configuration-on-cisco-ise-2-7-large/m-p/4435964#M568555" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ntp-servers-and-time-zones-configuration-on-cisco-ise-2-7-large/m-p/4435964#M568555&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;and or I would stick to&lt;STRONG&gt; UTC&lt;/STRONG&gt; ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;M.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:09:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5149164#M590810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Elsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-23T16:09:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Timezone Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5151316#M590860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's a matter of opinion.&amp;nbsp; When customers have ISE nodes in more than one time zone, the "Cisco recommends common time zone" has never been a satisfactory answer to me because they don't explain their reasoning.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see a few scenarios that could play out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Set the time zone of all nodes to UTC. In my opinion this is the only sensible option, but also the most annoying choice because it causes confusion and constant mental maths converting the times to get a frame of time reference, no matter where you are in the world (unless you're based in UTC!).&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Set the time zone of all nodes to the time zone where your ISE admins are located. This makes the job easier for the operations team because they have a common clock reference for their troubleshooting.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Set the time zone of each node to be in their respective region. This certainly makes reading the local logs easier for local admins, because they don't need to do any conversion for events. But it might cause confusion when trying to correlate events that occurred in other time zones.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The big question is what would ISE Live Logs look like in a user's browser, in various global locations, in each of the above scenarios?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; I believe that the answer is: it doesn't matter how you set the time zone of the ISE node - the Live Logs will display the &lt;EM&gt;arrival timestamps&lt;/EM&gt; in your local browser LOCALE settings, because they arrived in chronological order. But that might also be confusing for an ISE admin in New York viewing the same Live Logs in real time with another ISE Admin in Tokiyo - each user's PC will have their own time zone configured and it would be interesting to test all this out to see what would happen, unless someone has already done this and can answer these scenario questions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:33:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-timezone-configuration/m-p/5151316#M590860</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-25T20:33:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

