<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230185#M593424</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/309358"&gt;@REJR77&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Expected according to this&amp;nbsp; &lt;A title="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCut10928" href="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCut10928" target="_self"&gt;CSCut10928&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:21:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230178#M593423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have changed the admin certificates on a 4 nodes ISE deployment. (1PAN, 1SPAN, 2PSN with v3.1)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We performed the operation in the following order: PSN1, PSN2, SPAN, PAN, waiting each time for the services to be up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When changing Admin cert on the PAN (last node of the maintenance window) we observed that each node restarted one more time&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't remember that in the past, is that the expected behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230178#M593423</guid>
      <dc:creator>REJR77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T16:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230185#M593424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/309358"&gt;@REJR77&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Expected according to this&amp;nbsp; &lt;A title="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCut10928" href="https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCut10928" target="_self"&gt;CSCut10928&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230185#M593424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:21:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230198#M593426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/178747"&gt;@Flavio Miranda&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Such and old bug... Do you think it is still not fixed?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230198#M593426</guid>
      <dc:creator>REJR77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230199#M593427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe you just proved not LOL.&amp;nbsp; Just kidding but last update on the Bug was March 2024. chances are they are sitll there.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230199#M593427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:20:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230201#M593428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you are right.... &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face:"&gt;😀&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In environment where there are only 2 nodes it can be a little annoying&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230201#M593428</guid>
      <dc:creator>REJR77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230205#M593429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No fix release yet. The Bug is up and running.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="FlavioMiranda_0-1732814937879.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/234766i9612DB2872077663/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="FlavioMiranda_0-1732814937879.png" alt="FlavioMiranda_0-1732814937879.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230205#M593429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Flavio Miranda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-28T17:29:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Admin certificate replacement in 4 nodes deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230351#M593444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tend to always leave the PPAN till last - and before updating it, I promote the SPAN to Primary - it will restart both Admin nodes, but at least the PSNs keep running.&amp;nbsp; The idea is to avoid updating the Primary admin node - you can then promote the Standby back to Primary and then you are back where you started.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/admin-certificate-replacement-in-4-nodes-deployment/m-p/5230351#M593444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-29T03:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

