<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Posture required manually scan from user in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231370#M593508</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Why ISE 3.1 and not 3.3 or 3.4?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sounds like CoA is not working.&amp;nbsp; What is the NAD?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-02T13:00:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231154#M593501</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Cisco ISE lover,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to share current issue whether bug or expected result, as I test in lab for posture scan condition on Wired LAN and it required user to manually click "Scan Again" button to validate trusted device into authorization.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As our objective to automatically scan posture without human interaction, once the user plug in LAN and faster authorization (Permit any).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco ISE v3.1&lt;BR /&gt;ISE Posture/Secure Client 5.1.2.42&lt;BR /&gt;Compliant module 4.3.3335.6146&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you,&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 06:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231154#M593501</guid>
      <dc:creator>oumodom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-02T06:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231370#M593508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why ISE 3.1 and not 3.3 or 3.4?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sounds like CoA is not working.&amp;nbsp; What is the NAD?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231370#M593508</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-02T13:00:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231684#M593528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are right, But we found 3.3 and 3.4 are most bug.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;How to check CoA is working fine&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/199513"&gt;@ahollifield&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 03:54:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231684#M593528</guid>
      <dc:creator>oumodom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T03:54:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231690#M593529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;share your switch AAA config config where users connect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As recommended, this will help verify if COA is enabled.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 04:32:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231690#M593529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ambuj M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T04:32:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231726#M593535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325330"&gt;@Ambuj M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As remember, for Posture v4.9 it was doing well. But I can't confirm that v5.1 is bug existing or not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have more experience, please kindly another approach to check.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank so much&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325330"&gt;@Ambuj M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 07:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231726#M593535</guid>
      <dc:creator>oumodom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T07:13:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231886#M593541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the Live Logs you will dynamic authorization log messages.&amp;nbsp; These will be either pass or fail.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231886#M593541</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T13:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231888#M593542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-v4x-eol.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client/anyconnect-secure-mobility-client-v4x-eol.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5231888#M593542</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-03T13:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5232700#M593589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you elaborate than this please?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:43:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5232700#M593589</guid>
      <dc:creator>oumodom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T01:43:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Posture required manually scan from user</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5232871#M593602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean?&amp;nbsp; Open the Live Logs page, filter on a specific Endpoint ID (MAC Address).&amp;nbsp; You see both authc/authz messages and CoA logs here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 13:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/posture-required-manually-scan-from-user/m-p/5232871#M593602</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-05T13:15:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

