<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Report for new devices only? in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247594#M594219</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ultimately, yes. We would want to properly classify any new endpoints into an already existing profile/rule. At this point, I'm trying to determine what the day 2 impact would be of moving our default rule action though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Josh Morris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-15T16:46:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5246987#M594204</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm moving toward low-impact mode and am trying to answer the question of "How many new users can we expect to see after we convert to low-impact?" so I'll know how to staff resources on day n to properly resolve issues. We have Splunk and can generate some so-so reports, but its still not great. Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5246987#M594204</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-14T14:19:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247551#M594215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by "new users"?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:36:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247551#M594215</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T15:36:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247565#M594217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Low-impact ""monitor"" ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If yes then all endpoint connect to SW will known by ISE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you want to use context visible to add known endpoint to identity group?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MHM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247565#M594217</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHM Cisco World</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T15:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247593#M594218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In this case, it would mean new devices that come online. Ex: We have 50,000 endpoints and have properly classified all 50,000 and tomorrow we have 50,001 devices. I would like to be able to have a regular report of the new endpoints from that time periot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247593#M594218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T16:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247594#M594219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ultimately, yes. We would want to properly classify any new endpoints into an already existing profile/rule. At this point, I'm trying to determine what the day 2 impact would be of moving our default rule action though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247594#M594219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josh Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T16:46:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report for new devices only?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247651#M594223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why exactly?&amp;nbsp; If they match your policy, etc what value does this offer?&amp;nbsp; You can certainly do something like this in Splunk but I'm not sure how to accomplish it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:16:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/report-for-new-devices-only/m-p/5247651#M594223</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T17:16:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

