<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: DB Integration in ISE ODBC vs Active Directory in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5259478#M594916</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239707iD141A1CC02EE7280/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" alt="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-0/admin_guide/b_ISE_admin_3_0/b_ISE_admin_30_asset_visibility.html" target="_self"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-0/admin_guide/b_ISE_admin_3_0/b_ISE_admin_30_asset_visibility.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco ISE does not support encryption with ODBC. |Hence, ODBC connections are not secured&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 02:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JustTakeTheFirstStep</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-12T02:55:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DB Integration in ISE ODBC vs Active Directory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5239310#M593915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are trying to decide between ODBC and AD for our external DB.&lt;BR /&gt;We are familiar with AD, but not with ODBC.&lt;BR /&gt;Does the integration between ISE and ODBC work well?&lt;BR /&gt;We would be grateful to know your experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5239310#M593915</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustTakeTheFirstStep</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-20T12:20:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DB Integration in ISE ODBC vs Active Directory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5241075#M593954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends what your use case is.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AD has one major advantage over all the other methods (LDAP/ODBC) with regards to password protocol support. If you are doing simple PAP password checking (password string comparison), then AD/LDAP/ODBC are equivalent. But as soon as you need CHAP or MSCHAP protocols, then AD (and ISE internal user accounts) are the only option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If however, your use case involves looking up records in an existing ODBC database (e.g. a warehouse system, or a hospital patient record system) then ISE integration certainly works well. It's been a while, but you'll need to write some SQL stored procedures on your SQL back-end, and then ISE can call those procedures, and process the returned data, and map the results to ISE attributes, that you can use in the Authorization Policies. I find it quite tricky and fiddly, because I am not well versed in SQL - but you can find enough tips on web searches to make something happen.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many years ago there was a bug in ISE that prevented the successful fail-over from SQL server 1 to server 2 (if you provided two servers) - but I am sure that bug is resolved - but it would be worthwhile checking that the HA works as expected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 22:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5241075#M593954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-26T22:52:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: DB Integration in ISE ODBC vs Active Directory</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5259478#M594916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239707iD141A1CC02EE7280/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" alt="JustTakeTheFirstStep_0-1739328898259.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-0/admin_guide/b_ISE_admin_3_0/b_ISE_admin_30_asset_visibility.html" target="_self"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-0/admin_guide/b_ISE_admin_3_0/b_ISE_admin_30_asset_visibility.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco ISE does not support encryption with ODBC. |Hence, ODBC connections are not secured&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 02:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/db-integration-in-ise-odbc-vs-active-directory/m-p/5259478#M594916</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustTakeTheFirstStep</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-12T02:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

