<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Impact of Cisco DNAC Integration on ISE Resource Utilization in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/impact-of-cisco-dnac-integration-on-ise-resource-utilization/m-p/5263099#M595096</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;After the integration of ISE with DNAC (SD-Access Deployment), I noticed memory spikes and high resource utilization in Cisco ISE. I would like to understand the impact of this integration on resource consumption. Specifically, clarification on the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What specific types of communication occur between Cisco DNA Center and ISE post-integration?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How does this traffic contribute to system resource utilization on ISE?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there known cases where pxGrid-related traffic or other API interactions from DNA Center cause significant resource spikes in ISE?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MSN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-20T15:21:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of Cisco DNAC Integration on ISE Resource Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/impact-of-cisco-dnac-integration-on-ise-resource-utilization/m-p/5263099#M595096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After the integration of ISE with DNAC (SD-Access Deployment), I noticed memory spikes and high resource utilization in Cisco ISE. I would like to understand the impact of this integration on resource consumption. Specifically, clarification on the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What specific types of communication occur between Cisco DNA Center and ISE post-integration?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How does this traffic contribute to system resource utilization on ISE?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are there known cases where pxGrid-related traffic or other API interactions from DNA Center cause significant resource spikes in ISE?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/impact-of-cisco-dnac-integration-on-ise-resource-utilization/m-p/5263099#M595096</guid>
      <dc:creator>MSN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-20T15:21:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Impact of Cisco DNAC Integration on ISE Resource Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/impact-of-cisco-dnac-integration-on-ise-resource-utilization/m-p/5264850#M595216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know if Cisco has published any document that tells you exactly what goes on between these two systems, or how much data is exchanged.&amp;nbsp; My advice would be to run a tcpdump on both ISE nodes that have pxGrid enabled - and set a filter to only capture the traffic to your DNAC (probably the Enterprise VIP, or whatever your setup looks like).&amp;nbsp; Run that for 60 minutes and then run it through Wireshark to see IO stats and other cool charts.&amp;nbsp; It will tell you everything you need to know. The ISE tcpdump filter to capture only the traffic to and from 10.1.2.3 looks like this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;ip host 10.1.2.3&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 21:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/impact-of-cisco-dnac-integration-on-ise-resource-utilization/m-p/5264850#M595216</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-25T21:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

