<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Different Model of ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310070#M597298</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Adam!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Neinei</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-16T11:58:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309036#M597245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Evening all, would like to check for 2 different model of ISE, can both of them be primary and secondary node with same role (PAN,PSN and MnT)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:39:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309036#M597245</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neinei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T11:39:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309038#M597246</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1897543"&gt;@Neinei&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;yes, but you'd need to take in to consideration that both models of ISE hardware support the same version of ISE, depending on which hardware is used, the older models do not necessrily support the latest ISE versions. Also consider the size of the cluster, you'd have to scale the cluster to the older hardware, which may not necessarily support the same size cluster as the newer hardware.&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/performance_and_scalability/b_ise_perf_and_scale.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/performance_and_scalability/b_ise_perf_and_scale.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309038#M597246</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T11:47:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309039#M597247</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1897543"&gt;@Neinei&lt;/a&gt;:&amp;nbsp; Yes, it is possible.&amp;nbsp; That's what I am doing right now in a two nodes cluster environment.&amp;nbsp; Node1 is PAN/PMnT/PSN and node2 is SAN/SMnT/PSN.&amp;nbsp; In a small/medium environment, this is absolutely fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5309039#M597247</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamscottmaster2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T11:48:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310069#M597297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Rob!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310069#M597297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neinei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-16T11:58:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310070#M597298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Adam!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310070#M597298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Neinei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-16T11:58:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310727#M597342</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1897543"&gt;@Neinei&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Evening all, would like to check for 2 different model of ISE, can both of them be primary and secondary node with same role (PAN,PSN and MnT)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cpctraining.org/" target="_self"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" color="#FFFFFF"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;c p c t r a i n i n g c o s t&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, two different ISE models can function as primary and secondary nodes with the same roles (PAN, PSN, MnT), as long as they're compatible and running the same verion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:39:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5310727#M597342</guid>
      <dc:creator>woordnelson6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-30T17:39:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5374397#M599957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great question, Neinei. In most deployments, different models of &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Cisco Identity Services Engine&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; can technically coexist, but you’ll want to carefully review hardware specs and performance capacity before assigning identical roles like PAN, PSN, and Mn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:02:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5374397#M599957</guid>
      <dc:creator>ksarestaurantsz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-04T13:02:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different Model of ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5374433#M599961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://cs.co/ise-scale" target="_blank"&gt;https://cs.co/ise-scale&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/different-model-of-ise/m-p/5374433#M599961</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-04T15:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

