<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE Upgrade with GUI method in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373413#M599909</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325343"&gt;@Christopher Bell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you reminded me of another convenient feature of the GUI method - you can also upgrade multiple nodes in parallel. E.g. you can select all you secondaries (e.g. secondary TACACS, RADIUS1/RADIUS2/, pxGrid) and upgrade them all at once. Once those are done and active again, you select all the primary nodes in that cohort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't recall much baby sitting, other than observing the progress bar in the GUI while I got on with other things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-27T21:03:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Upgrade with GUI method</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373106#M599885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello ISE Community, I am planning an upgrade of my 3.3 deployment and I was curious if anyone has had success with the GUI upgrade method. In the past I have used the CLI and the backup and restore method and not I am seeing in the 3.5 upgrade guide that the GUI is the recommended method so I am curious to hear of any success (or other) stories and some detail on the time it took to complete. I have a large distributed deployment of 32 total nodes and in the past it has taken an entire weekend starting Friday evening and finishing up Sunday afternoon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Upgrade Fun&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 19:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373106#M599885</guid>
      <dc:creator>henry.astorga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-26T19:40:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Upgrade with GUI method</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373121#M599887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have had great success with GUI upgrades since 3.3.&amp;nbsp; There seems to be a group of people who will never use it because the CLI gives you more control. And that is true - you have 100% control. However, with the GUI it guides you through the process and you can't really mess it up.&amp;nbsp; I will say however, the one time the GUI caused me some trouble was on a remote PSN that was on a slow WAN.&amp;nbsp; I was unable to break out of the GUI when I had already started the code distribution. I wanted to push the upgrade bundle to the DISK:/&amp;nbsp; repo overnight, and then tell the upgrade wizard to fetch the code there.&amp;nbsp; Now I know to do that in advance and it works great.&amp;nbsp; The GUI also has the nice feature to specify the upgrade bundle + patch. It applies them both - which is nice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my view, if an ISE upgrade fails, it's not necessarily because you used the GUI. I do URT and all the checks beforehand - the rest is up to chance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 21:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373121#M599887</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-26T21:32:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Upgrade with GUI method</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373276#M599902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Once I got everything set up to use the CLI method and tried it the first time, I can tell you I'll never use the GUI again.&amp;nbsp; That being said our deployment is rather large, about 30 PSN's across multiple sites.&amp;nbsp; Each site has 6 PSN's, 2 for TACACS and 4 for RADIUS.&amp;nbsp; Using the CLI, I can upgrade one node from each site at the same time without disruption (our deployment sits behind load balancers).&amp;nbsp; This makes it go so much faster.&amp;nbsp; Using the GUI, I would be here for 6-8 hours babysitting it.&amp;nbsp; Just my opinion.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373276#M599902</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-27T13:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE Upgrade with GUI method</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373413#M599909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/325343"&gt;@Christopher Bell&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;you reminded me of another convenient feature of the GUI method - you can also upgrade multiple nodes in parallel. E.g. you can select all you secondaries (e.g. secondary TACACS, RADIUS1/RADIUS2/, pxGrid) and upgrade them all at once. Once those are done and active again, you select all the primary nodes in that cohort.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't recall much baby sitting, other than observing the progress bar in the GUI while I got on with other things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-upgrade-with-gui-method/m-p/5373413#M599909</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne Bier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-27T21:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

