<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ISE policy Server Issue in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-server-issue/m-p/5568107#M600950</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;connectiondata.xml Have these clients previously connected to those PSNs before? How is your redirect policy configured? Redirection or redirectionless posture?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why use ISE Posture at all? Why not use MDM-based posture instead?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-08-05T17:16:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE policy Server Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-server-issue/m-p/5567809#M600935</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cisco ISE Posture Issue – Some Clients Are Assigned to the Wrong Policy Server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am facing an issue with Cisco ISE Posture and would appreciate your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a Cisco ISE deployment with four nodes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Production ISE1 (0.0.0.1)– Policy Service Node (PSN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Production ISE2 (0.0.0.2) – Monitoring Node&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DR ISE1 (1.1.1.1)– Policy Service Node (PSN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DR ISE2 (1.1.1.2)** – Monitoring Node&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using wired authentication and have configured the RADIUS servers on the switch in the following order:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Production ISE1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. DR ISE1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Production ISE2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. DR ISE2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At one branch, around 10 PCs are connected to the switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After applying the ISE configuration to the switch ports:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most clients authenticate successfully and become Compliant&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;On these working PCs, Cisco Secure Client shows Production ISE1 as the Policy Server, which is the expected behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, a few PCs do not become compliant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When we check ISE Posture Statistics, these affected clients are using DR ISE1 as their Policy Server instead of Production ISE1, even though both working and non-working PCs are connected to the same switch and are using the same switch configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are some clients being assigned to DR ISE1 as the Policy Server while others are correctly assigned to Production ISE1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone experienced this behavior before? What could cause different clients on the same switch to receive different Policy Servers for posture?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance or troubleshooting suggestions&amp;nbsp;Would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:33:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-server-issue/m-p/5567809#M600935</guid>
      <dc:creator>shoaib-akhtar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-04T00:33:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ISE policy Server Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-server-issue/m-p/5568107#M600950</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;connectiondata.xml Have these clients previously connected to those PSNs before? How is your redirect policy configured? Redirection or redirectionless posture?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why use ISE Posture at all? Why not use MDM-based posture instead?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-policy-server-issue/m-p/5568107#M600950</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahollifield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-05T17:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

