<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OSPF authentication in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280505#M6069</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having trouble getting a PIX 515E to form an adjacency with a MSFC2 router using md5 authentication.  MSFC2 goes from exstart to down complaining about too many dbd retransmissions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hlongley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:08:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280505#M6069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having trouble getting a PIX 515E to form an adjacency with a MSFC2 router using md5 authentication.  MSFC2 goes from exstart to down complaining about too many dbd retransmissions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280505#M6069</guid>
      <dc:creator>hlongley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T18:08:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280506#M6070</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you able to form the adj between the PIX and the MSFC is you use clear text or no authentication?  I recall a bug in the MSFC code relating to this.  Please confirm and I will dig it up for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:04:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280506#M6070</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-31T17:04:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280507#M6071</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah,  works great with no authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280507#M6071</guid>
      <dc:creator>hlongley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-31T17:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280508#M6072</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, thanks for checking on this.  Looks like CSCeb77142 to me.  Go ahead and open a TAC case and request that the engineer post the latest 6.3(3) interim release for you.  Give that a shot and let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:42:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280508#M6072</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoclayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-31T18:42:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280509#M6073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the help.  I opened a TAC case and will let you know how it works out.  I had seen that bug but had not delved down to a fragmented packet level as of yet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280509#M6073</guid>
      <dc:creator>hlongley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-10-31T19:09:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF authentication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280510#M6074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We loaded the interim code 6.3.3(100) and now no problem authenticating with the routers.  Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ospf-authentication/m-p/280510#M6074</guid>
      <dc:creator>hlongley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-11-05T16:40:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

