<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic So an ISE license including in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464740#M87228</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r.westman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-23T14:24:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Failover Device Licensing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464732#M87211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am working on getting ISE licensing requirements put together for the upcoming budget.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am confused on licensing for a failover appliance. Do we need to get another set of licenses for the failover appliance, or will the licenses for the primary device cover the failover?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464732#M87211</guid>
      <dc:creator>gocarroll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:32:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,Prior to ISE Release 1.2,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464733#M87212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prior to ISE Release 1.2, customers could only specify ISE licenses to be registered to a single ISE Administration Node (i.e., the Primary Administration Node). Now, ISE Release 1.2 delivers the capability to register ISE licenses to two Administration Nodes (i.e., Primary and Secondary Administration Nodes). The registration of an ISE license to the Primary Administration Node remains mandatory, but the option to register a Secondary Administrative Node is available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reference link,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/sales_tool_c96-729045.html&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:19:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464733#M87212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anas Naqvi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-17T22:19:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excellent! Thank you for your</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464734#M87215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Excellent!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your swift response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464734#M87215</guid>
      <dc:creator>gocarroll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-18T12:57:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Could You tell me please:If I</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464735#M87217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could You tell me please:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have two ISE physical appliances (3395 and 3495) . One of them is licensed, will HA and failover work ? Is there a difference if You use same appliance models or not?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464735#M87217</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvaldasOu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-21T11:34:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The appliance models will not</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464736#M87218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The appliance models will not matter.&amp;nbsp; Be sure to have both appliances licensed, though.&amp;nbsp; Here is how to do that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12381521/adding-license-ise-secondary-admin-node"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12381521/adding-license-ise-secondary-admin-node&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Charles Moreton&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 20:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464736#M87218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie Moreton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-21T20:40:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Charles, that's great!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464737#M87220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Charles, that's great!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, is it possible to do HA if You have one physical and one virtual (VM) ISE appliance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464737#M87220</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvaldasOu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-22T09:24:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, you can mix Virtual and</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464738#M87223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can mix Virtual and Physical Appliances.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464738#M87223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charlie Moreton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-22T14:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So an ISE license including</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464739#M87226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 18.3999996185303px;"&gt;So an ISE&amp;nbsp;license including both&amp;nbsp;primary and secondary UDI&amp;nbsp;is always necessary OR&amp;nbsp;only necessary when the secondary&amp;nbsp;admin node needs to be promoted a primary&amp;nbsp;admin node?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464739#M87226</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.westman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-23T14:23:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So an ISE license including</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464740#M87228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 14:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-failover-device-licensing/m-p/2464740#M87228</guid>
      <dc:creator>r.westman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-23T14:24:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

