<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Use of second interface (eth1) on ISE in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483213#M87722</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. I am seting up a two-node deployment of ISE (3315 - version &lt;STRONG&gt;1.2.0.899&lt;/STRONG&gt;). Both appliances will be connected to my two core switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if I just have to configure one ethernet interface (eth0) on each ISE server and then connect each eth0 to a different swithch. Or, in order to get more redundancy, should I configure both ethernet interfaces on each ISE appliance and then connect eth0 to switch 1 and eth1 to switch2 on both appliances?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>santiago.lorente</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:27:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use of second interface (eth1) on ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483213#M87722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. I am seting up a two-node deployment of ISE (3315 - version &lt;STRONG&gt;1.2.0.899&lt;/STRONG&gt;). Both appliances will be connected to my two core switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know if I just have to configure one ethernet interface (eth0) on each ISE server and then connect each eth0 to a different swithch. Or, in order to get more redundancy, should I configure both ethernet interfaces on each ISE appliance and then connect eth0 to switch 1 and eth1 to switch2 on both appliances?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483213#M87722</guid>
      <dc:creator>santiago.lorente</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:27:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of second interface (eth1) on ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483214#M87723</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV id="__tbSetup"&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco ISE management is restricted to Gigabit Ethernet 0. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:45:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483214#M87723</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venkatesh Attuluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-26T18:45:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>yes, you can do that , as all</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483215#M87724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes, you can do that , as all the ports can be used for replication and synchronization but for management is restricted to Eth0 only.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 05:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/use-of-second-interface-eth1-on-ise/m-p/2483215#M87724</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saurav Lodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-10T05:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

