<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE inline VPN Posture in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433873#M88343</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" height="2" src="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif" width="19" /&gt;For&amp;nbsp; certain devices, you may want to bypass authentication, posture&amp;nbsp; assessment, role assignment, or any combination thereof. Common examples&amp;nbsp; of bypassed device types include printers, IP phones, servers,&amp;nbsp; nonclient machines, and network devices. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1154251"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Inline Posture matches the MAC, MAC and IP, or subnet address to determine whether the bypass function is enabled for a device. You can choose to bypass policy enforcement or to forcibly block access. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1167364"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Caution &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" height="2" src="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif" width="6" /&gt;Do not configure the MAC address in a MAC filter for a directly connected ASA VPN device without also entering the IP address. Without the addition of the optional IP&amp;nbsp; address, VPN clients are allowed to bypass policy enforcement. This&amp;nbsp; bypass happens because the VPN is a Layer 3 hop for clients, and the&amp;nbsp; device uses its own MAC address as the source address to send packets along the network toward the Inline Posture node. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Naveen Kumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-06T09:19:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE inline VPN Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433871#M88341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following setup for the VPN inline posturing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN Users ----- ASA ----- ISE (ipep) ------ Core SW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the ASA, I have 2 tunnel-groups, the 1st one uses the ISE as radius server, and the 2nd one is using local authentication, and they are sharing the same IP pool (ASA inside interface subnet).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the users connect to tunnel-group with ISE, all is working fine, the NAC agent installed and users can access internal resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When any user connects to tunnel-group without ISE, he cannot access any internal resources, even that the routing and everything is configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The filter configuration here is only applied to ASA inside interface, when I add all the subnet to the filter configuration, we can access the inside VLANs but without we cannot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this means that I do bypass posture assessment for all the traffic from this pool (with and without ISE)? or I need to have 2 seperate pools for that? The filter configuration is not that clear in this setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahmad. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433871#M88341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ahmad Murad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:21:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE inline VPN Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433872#M88342</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer the ISE inline posture config. from&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:00:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433872#M88342</guid>
      <dc:creator>Saurav Lodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-05T09:00:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE inline VPN Posture</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433873#M88343</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" height="2" src="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif" width="19" /&gt;For&amp;nbsp; certain devices, you may want to bypass authentication, posture&amp;nbsp; assessment, role assignment, or any combination thereof. Common examples&amp;nbsp; of bypassed device types include printers, IP phones, servers,&amp;nbsp; nonclient machines, and network devices. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1154251"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Inline Posture matches the MAC, MAC and IP, or subnet address to determine whether the bypass function is enabled for a device. You can choose to bypass policy enforcement or to forcibly block access. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A name="wp1167364"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Caution &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" height="2" src="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif" width="6" /&gt;Do not configure the MAC address in a MAC filter for a directly connected ASA VPN device without also entering the IP address. Without the addition of the optional IP&amp;nbsp; address, VPN clients are allowed to bypass policy enforcement. This&amp;nbsp; bypass happens because the VPN is a Layer 3 hop for clients, and the&amp;nbsp; device uses its own MAC address as the source address to send packets along the network toward the Inline Posture node. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:19:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433873#M88343</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveen Kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-06T09:19:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have a similar scenario:VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433874#M88344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a similar scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN users ----- ASA ----- ISE-ipep (HA) ----- Core SW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two pools for users. One pool (192.168.0.0/22) is intended for laptops with anyconnect authenticated by ISE (Internal – further would be AD). The second pool (192.168.4.0/22) is intended for mobile devices (smartphones and iDevices); authenticated by ASA certificates and bypassed in the IPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the first tests, the laptops can be authenticated by ISE Internal DB, but users can’t access internal resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the problem may be originating in something extraneous I saw in the IPN routing table. On the GUI the route for 192.168.0.0/22 has the ASA interface as default gateway, but on the CLI the same route appears to not have default gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will appreciate any assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel Escalante&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433874#M88344</guid>
      <dc:creator>descalante2007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-08T00:04:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi,I solved this issue by</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433875#M88345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I solved this issue by splitting the ip pool (/24) to 2 * (/25) subnets, and assign each pool to a different tunnel-group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the ISE IPEP node, I did filter for the non-secure pool (non-secure tunnel-group) so the ISE will only pass this traffic without applying any policy on it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did that using the filters, and ensure that the routing us correct on the Core SW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The filter configuration is for the IP addresses, not MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot remember the command on the pep CLI itself, that you can show the filters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea that you need the traffic to pass through the IPEP without posturing, so you need to have split traffic, and apply filters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case you need more help, you're welcome to ask.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahmad.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433875#M88345</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ahmad Murad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-15T11:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>kindly check the link for</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433876#M88346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;kindly check the link for step by step config for Inline.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-engine/115724-vpn-inpost-asa-00.html&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-vpn-posture/m-p/2433876#M88346</guid>
      <dc:creator>kaaftab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-25T18:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

