<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ISE Inline Posture Node ACL limitations in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-posture-node-acl-limitations/m-p/2416381#M89141</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear colleagues,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you please advise whether any known issues exist with the number of ACL entries limitations when applying on ISE Inline Posture Node for VPN-connections?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We faced with the problem, when ACLs longer than 100 entries cannot be applied on IPN SNS 3415. ISE doesn't indicates any errors, VPN-client status turns "compliant", however "show pep tables accesslist normal" doesn't show any related ACL for the session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACLs with up to 99 records apply without any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any support,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Denis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dimelbaev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:12:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Inline Posture Node ACL limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-posture-node-acl-limitations/m-p/2416381#M89141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear colleagues,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you please advise whether any known issues exist with the number of ACL entries limitations when applying on ISE Inline Posture Node for VPN-connections?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We faced with the problem, when ACLs longer than 100 entries cannot be applied on IPN SNS 3415. ISE doesn't indicates any errors, VPN-client status turns "compliant", however "show pep tables accesslist normal" doesn't show any related ACL for the session.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACLs with up to 99 records apply without any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any support,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Denis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-posture-node-acl-limitations/m-p/2416381#M89141</guid>
      <dc:creator>dimelbaev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ISE Inline Posture Node ACL limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-posture-node-acl-limitations/m-p/2416382#M89142</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Denis,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did some research and could not find anything related to a dacl limit for the inline node, I remember there being a size limit for the DACL but I can not find that document handy but then i ran into this thread here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.cisco.com/thread/2219621"&gt;https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2219621&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tarik Admani &lt;BR /&gt;*Please rate helpful posts*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 06:27:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/ise-inline-posture-node-acl-limitations/m-p/2416382#M89142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tarik Admani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-31T06:27:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

