<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I don't even think this is on in Network Access Control</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533189#M89417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't even think this is on the works. I asked during Cisco live and I was told that it is not on the road-map. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Thank you for rating helpful posts!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:37:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-21T20:37:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>When WLC will dACL from ISE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533188#M89416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are used ISE for aaa our users, but our problems is not simple configuration ACL for users access on WLC,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When Cisco make support dACL on WLC (not airspaceACL), it's very important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because using GUI WCL for create ACL with limit 64 entry, you think it's normal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are do not use VLAN assignment, because it's not work correctly in PEAP MS Windows DomainMachine or User authen, and after DomainMachine auth, User auth not vlan assignment, and user should reconnect to WLAN for correct VLAN&amp;nbsp; assignment.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 04:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533188#M89416</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tekunov Mikhail</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T04:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I don't even think this is on</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533189#M89417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't even think this is on the works. I asked during Cisco live and I was told that it is not on the road-map. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Thank you for rating helpful posts!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:37:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533189#M89417</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-21T20:37:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>To further expand, I think</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533190#M89418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To further expand, I think Cisco and the industry is heading towards SGT/SGA so dACLs are going to be the "old-way" of doing things.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119); font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(247, 247, 247);"&gt;Thank you for rating helpful posts!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/when-wlc-will-dacl-from-ise/m-p/2533190#M89418</guid>
      <dc:creator>nspasov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-21T20:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

