<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783397#M1001928</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  We will buy two ASA 5520 do failover, one ASA has CSC-SSM, no CSC-SSM in the failover one.  Is it ok to config ASA failover with one CSC-SSM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bma</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:44:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783397#M1001928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  We will buy two ASA 5520 do failover, one ASA has CSC-SSM, no CSC-SSM in the failover one.  Is it ok to config ASA failover with one CSC-SSM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783397#M1001928</guid>
      <dc:creator>bma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:44:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783398#M1001929</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The units need to be the same in every aspect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783398#M1001929</guid>
      <dc:creator>timkaye</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-13T05:55:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783399#M1001930</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we don't need CSC failover, only firewall is failover, is it ok with one CSC in the primary one? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783399#M1001930</guid>
      <dc:creator>bma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-13T14:55:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783400#M1001931</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No your system will not function properly. The two ASAs must be the same in every aspect hardware and software. The ironic part, although I do not see a setting for this, should the CSC have an issue, the unit will fail over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover/m-p/783400#M1001931</guid>
      <dc:creator>mherald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-15T22:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

