<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PIX506E without NAT (multiple public IPs) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix506e-without-nat-multiple-public-ips/m-p/749577#M1003809</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never configured a PIX506E without NAT but I'm planning on doing it for one of my customers (their PBX/VOiP server requires a no-Nat connection).  They're going to have a T1 router route the addresses to the PIX, the PIX will have public addresses on both interfaces (outside/inside) and then I was planning on putting static routes to the other internal IPs via the inside interface.  Will this work and if not, can you guys recommend a better way of accomplishing this?  Any input will be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ph0enix</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:25:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX506E without NAT (multiple public IPs)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix506e-without-nat-multiple-public-ips/m-p/749577#M1003809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never configured a PIX506E without NAT but I'm planning on doing it for one of my customers (their PBX/VOiP server requires a no-Nat connection).  They're going to have a T1 router route the addresses to the PIX, the PIX will have public addresses on both interfaces (outside/inside) and then I was planning on putting static routes to the other internal IPs via the inside interface.  Will this work and if not, can you guys recommend a better way of accomplishing this?  Any input will be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:25:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix506e-without-nat-multiple-public-ips/m-p/749577#M1003809</guid>
      <dc:creator>ph0enix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:25:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX506E without NAT (multiple public IPs)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix506e-without-nat-multiple-public-ips/m-p/749578#M1003810</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It can work I think.  Although are the other internal IPs going to be routed to another router/l3 switch?  The PIX does not handle having multiple virtual IPs per interface very well (it requires using VLANs and dot1q trunking).  Also when using public IPs behind a PIX you have to configure a static nat statement even so to ensure that it's handled correctly.  Basically all traffic going through a pix either has to be NATed or explicitly indicated to be not NATed.  for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 4.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 4.2.2.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're not used to the PIX this type of command seems redundant, but it actually enables the PIX to pass the public IPs on the inside interface thru the device. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix506e-without-nat-multiple-public-ips/m-p/749578#M1003810</guid>
      <dc:creator>cmcbride</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-05T13:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

