<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balance in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balance/m-p/732418#M1003852</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Davis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK pix supports redundancy/load balancing based on the failover concepts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can either configure them on Active/Standby or Active/Active through which you can achieve both the chassis serving the load without any hassles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But to have the same in place you need to have 2 PIX boxes with required licensing..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>spremkumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-04T03:12:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balance/m-p/732417#M1003851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the PIX supports load balance (or load sharing like checkpoint) and clustering?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:24:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balance/m-p/732417#M1003851</guid>
      <dc:creator>davisdev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:24:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balance/m-p/732418#M1003852</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Davis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK pix supports redundancy/load balancing based on the failover concepts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can either configure them on Active/Standby or Active/Active through which you can achieve both the chassis serving the load without any hassles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But to have the same in place you need to have 2 PIX boxes with required licensing..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 03:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balance/m-p/732418#M1003852</guid>
      <dc:creator>spremkumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-04T03:12:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

