<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firepower Recommended Rules in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3711473#M1003894</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The base policy (connectivity over security) will still be in affect but the policies will be adjusted based on the recommended rules.&amp;nbsp; Firepower recommended rules are enabled/disabled based on the hosts, applications and protocols that have been discovered through network discovery&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rsharp001</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-22T04:54:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower Recommended Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3708682#M1003889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am just wondering, does my base policy such as Connectivity over Security intrusion rule will be in use if I generate and use Firepower Recommended Rules in my Intrusion Policy?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3708682#M1003889</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T13:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Recommended Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3708943#M1003891</link>
      <description>It will be used as base-line (including signature and advanced settings)&lt;BR /&gt;but signatures will be customized based on recommendation, i.e. some of the&lt;BR /&gt;signatures will be disabled based your environment to avoid unnecessary&lt;BR /&gt;rule being verified.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3708943#M1003891</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-18T16:35:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Recommended Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3710099#M1003893</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Understand that but does every traffic that passes to the IPS will it use the Firepower recommended rules instead of the base intrusion policy? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3710099#M1003893</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-20T05:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firepower Recommended Rules</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3711473#M1003894</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The base policy (connectivity over security) will still be in affect but the policies will be adjusted based on the recommended rules.&amp;nbsp; Firepower recommended rules are enabled/disabled based on the hosts, applications and protocols that have been discovered through network discovery&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-recommended-rules/m-p/3711473#M1003894</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsharp001</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-22T04:54:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

