topic IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569293#M100452 <P>Hi everyone, </P><P></P><P>I have the following case:</P><P></P><P>2 x Cat6509 (HSRP master and slave)</P><P>2 x IDSM blades (v5.0 - 229)</P><P>each Cat has his own IDSM blade install online (not inline), with 2 monitoring sessions on each Cat.</P><P></P><P>There is any way to monitor traffic over 600 Mbps in those 2 different blades?</P><P></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P><P></P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:02:48 GMT coredumpbp 2019-03-10T10:02:48Z IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569293#M100452 <P>Hi everyone, </P><P></P><P>I have the following case:</P><P></P><P>2 x Cat6509 (HSRP master and slave)</P><P>2 x IDSM blades (v5.0 - 229)</P><P>each Cat has his own IDSM blade install online (not inline), with 2 monitoring sessions on each Cat.</P><P></P><P>There is any way to monitor traffic over 600 Mbps in those 2 different blades?</P><P></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P><P></P> Sun, 10 Mar 2019 10:02:48 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569293#M100452 coredumpbp 2019-03-10T10:02:48Z Re: IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569294#M100460 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The IDSM only can process 600 Mbps. You could perhaps divide the load by inspecting different VLANs on each IDSM using access maps.</P><P></P><P><A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007e70d.html#wp1055516" target="_blank">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007e70d.html#wp1055516</A></P><P></P><P>I hope it helps .. Please rate it if it does !!!</P><P></P><P></P><P></P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:05:29 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569294#M100460 Fernando_Meza 2006-06-02T04:05:29Z Re: IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569295#M100467 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>uuuTt</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:21:49 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569295#M100467 commteam100 2006-06-06T07:21:49Z Re: IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569296#M100487 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>I have doubts that 2 IDSM2 blades can&#146;t cover traffic around 300 Mbps as I can&#146;t get from the SNMP statistics. That&#146;s way I was asking how 2 blades can be configure without having problem with interVLAN traffic.</P><P></P><P>FYI</P><P> evStatus: eventId=1136715333146415062 vendor=Cisco </P><P> originator: </P><P> hostId: Cisco-IDSM2-1 </P><P> appName: interface </P><P> appInstanceId: 425 </P><P> time: June 7, 2006 7:34:01 AM UTC offset=180 timeZone=GMT+02:00 </P><P> netInterfaceMissedPacketThresholdExceeded: </P><P> description: GigabitEthernet0/7 : Missed-packet threshold was exceeded. 912% of packets were missed. </P><P> interfaceName: GigabitEthernet0/7 </P><P></P><P>Rgds</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:33:43 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569296#M100487 coredumpbp 2006-06-07T07:33:43Z Re: IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569297#M100489 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>I have doubts that 2 IDSM2 blades can&#146;t cover traffic around 300 Mbps as I can&#146;t get from the SNMP statistics. That&#146;s way I was asking how 2 blades can be configure without having problem with interVLAN traffic. </P><P></P><P>FYI </P><P>evStatus: eventId=1136715333146415062 vendor=Cisco </P><P>originator: </P><P>hostId: Cisco-IDSM2-1 </P><P>appName: interface </P><P>appInstanceId: 425 </P><P>time: June 7, 2006 7:34:01 AM UTC offset=180 timeZone=GMT+02:00 </P><P>netInterfaceMissedPacketThresholdExceeded: </P><P>description: GigabitEthernet0/7 : Missed-packet threshold was exceeded. 912% of packets were missed. </P><P>interfaceName: GigabitEthernet0/7 </P><P></P><P>Rgds </P><P></P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:34:40 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569297#M100489 coredumpbp 2006-06-07T07:34:40Z Re: IDSM2 (5.0) Implementation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569298#M100491 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi</P><P></P><P>all depends on your topology. </P><P></P><P>- if it's possible you can make 1st Cat be master for 1st half of routed vlans, 2nd Cat for 2nd half splitting traffic load between chasis and two IDSMs</P><P>or </P><P>- try to play with span/rspan/vacl redirects,</P><P>dcsrnd.pdf is your friend</P><P></P><P>tk</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:57:11 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/idsm2-5-0-implementation/m-p/569298#M100491 kotek 2006-06-07T08:57:11Z