<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059190#M1004626</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an IPSec tunnel established between our office and another site using 2 ASA 5510s running 8.0(3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a T1 connecting these sites.  I want to be able to use CBWFQ on the serial interfaces of the routers. How can I copy the "copy" the DSCP value into the IP header of the ESP packet on the ASA, if the DSCP is set on the ingress interface of the ASA?  I want certain VPN traffic to be placed into different queues on the serial interfaces.  I see there the "qos pre-classify" command that exists for routers.  Does the ASA have something simular?  If no, what can I do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>support</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T10:57:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059190#M1004626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an IPSec tunnel established between our office and another site using 2 ASA 5510s running 8.0(3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a T1 connecting these sites.  I want to be able to use CBWFQ on the serial interfaces of the routers. How can I copy the "copy" the DSCP value into the IP header of the ESP packet on the ASA, if the DSCP is set on the ingress interface of the ASA?  I want certain VPN traffic to be placed into different queues on the serial interfaces.  I see there the "qos pre-classify" command that exists for routers.  Does the ASA have something simular?  If no, what can I do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:57:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059190#M1004626</guid>
      <dc:creator>support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T10:57:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059191#M1004627</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought the DSCP bit is automatically coped from the inner header to the outer header as per the RFC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QOS pre-classify is only required if you need to    apply QOS policies based on other parameters (not copied or visible) at the egress interace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g. in case of IPSEC tunnel mode the layer 4 port-numbers are not visible. For transport mode more fields are visible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farrukh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059191#M1004627</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farrukh Haroon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T01:26:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059192#M1004628</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i agree with Farrukh &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;according to cisco SRND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Cisco AVVID solutions, the IP Phone and gateways provide the capability to set the ToS byte so&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;routers can make the appropriate QoS decision. However, most data applications do not set the ToS byte&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and queuing decisions must be based on other fields of the IP header, including source/destination IP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;address, port numbers, and protocol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once the original IP packet is encrypted by IPSec, fields other than ToS byte, such as port numbers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;protocol and source/destination IP address fields, are no longer in clear text and cannot match an output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service policy. QoS Pre-Classify is an Cisco IOS software feature to allow fancy queuing,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CBWFQ/WFQ, at the output interface to match on these other fields in the original IP header, even after&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the original IP header is encrypted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;howver&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;u can use matching in the calss map and make the matching based on ur vpn tunnel-gourp that u have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the case u can play with priority or bandwidth limitation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;check the following link&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIX/ASA 7.x and Later: Bandwidth Management(Rate Limit) Using QoS Policies&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a008084de0c.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a008084de0c.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please, if helpful Rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059192#M1004628</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T02:00:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059193#M1004629</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Awesome!  I did not realize the RFC called for that ToS bytes to be copied from the inner header to the outer header.  I was planning on testing this out today by creating the policy-maps and running a capture on the other VPN endpoint to see if I see the DSCP bits set in the outer headers.  I will let you guys know what I find.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059193#M1004629</guid>
      <dc:creator>support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T12:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059194#M1004630</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;good luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please, if helpful rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:55:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059194#M1004630</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T13:55:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059195#M1004632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It does work!  Thanks for letting me know this!  See attached picture.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059195#M1004632</guid>
      <dc:creator>support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T17:26:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBWFQ &amp; IPSec VPN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059196#M1004634</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brantley  this is 5+ &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cbwfq-ipsec-vpn/m-p/1059196#M1004634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-13T04:35:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

