<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTD as IPS Deployment in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-as-ips-deployment/m-p/3697584#M1004666</link>
    <description>Here you go.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   - When you configure an Inline Pair 2 Physical interfaces are internally&lt;BR /&gt;   bridged&lt;BR /&gt;   - Very similar to classic inline Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)&lt;BR /&gt;   - Available in Routed or Transparent Deployment modes&lt;BR /&gt;   - Most of the LINA engine features (NAT, Routing etc) are not available&lt;BR /&gt;   for flows which go through an Inline Pair&lt;BR /&gt;   - Transit traffic can be dropped&lt;BR /&gt;   - Few LINA engine checks are applied along with full Snort engine checks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Short answer, inline pair will act as IPS and not routing will be taking&lt;BR /&gt;place for packets coming on inline interface.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-30T05:47:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTD as IPS Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-as-ips-deployment/m-p/3697274#M1004665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am deploying a new 4100 as an IPS but when I register it in FMC it shows routed mode. Does it affect the IPS if it run in routed mode? I just want my IPS like a bump in a wire so I decided to configure it with inline pairs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does it still check for routing even though my interfaces are inline pairs?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-as-ips-deployment/m-p/3697274#M1004665</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T16:09:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTD as IPS Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-as-ips-deployment/m-p/3697584#M1004666</link>
      <description>Here you go.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   - When you configure an Inline Pair 2 Physical interfaces are internally&lt;BR /&gt;   bridged&lt;BR /&gt;   - Very similar to classic inline Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)&lt;BR /&gt;   - Available in Routed or Transparent Deployment modes&lt;BR /&gt;   - Most of the LINA engine features (NAT, Routing etc) are not available&lt;BR /&gt;   for flows which go through an Inline Pair&lt;BR /&gt;   - Transit traffic can be dropped&lt;BR /&gt;   - Few LINA engine checks are applied along with full Snort engine checks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Short answer, inline pair will act as IPS and not routing will be taking&lt;BR /&gt;place for packets coming on inline interface.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ftd-as-ips-deployment/m-p/3697584#M1004666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-30T05:47:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

