<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic pix515E and FO unit in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix515e-and-fo-unit/m-p/760609#M1005260</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a pix515E with a VAC. My question is, if I buy a FO-unit, should this unit have a VAC too, or is it possible to have a FO-unit with a VAC+ ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>beheerggd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:09:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix515E and FO unit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix515e-and-fo-unit/m-p/760609#M1005260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a pix515E with a VAC. My question is, if I buy a FO-unit, should this unit have a VAC too, or is it possible to have a FO-unit with a VAC+ ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:09:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix515e-and-fo-unit/m-p/760609#M1005260</guid>
      <dc:creator>beheerggd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:09:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix515E and FO unit</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix515e-and-fo-unit/m-p/760610#M1005262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover License :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Designed for use in conjunction with a similar Cisco PIX Security Appliance model that has an Unrestricted license, providing a cost-effective, Active/Standby high-availability solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Provides the same capabilities as the Unrestricted license, except the Failover license does not support Active/Active failover. Requires presence of similar Cisco PIX Security Appliance model with an Unrestricted license to operate properly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can have VAC+ with FO unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer this link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a00800b0d85.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a00800b0d85.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix515e-and-fo-unit/m-p/760610#M1005262</guid>
      <dc:creator>carenas123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-11T19:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

