<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E) in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760639#M1005275</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are several changes in the ASA CLI that you should be aware (but not afraid) of.  The interface configuration is more IOS like now.  Also, vpn's are configured a little differently using the concept of groups.  I know PIX 7.x will accept old style vpn commands and automagically convert them, but I don't know if the ASA has this logic.  Also, the 7.x no longer supports conduits in either PIX or ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fixup commands have been deprecated in the 7.x OS, in favor of inspection maps (again, more IOS like syntax).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These examples scratch the surface of the differences, but are most likely the ones you will first encounter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short though, if you know PIX 6.x (or 7.x), the ASA should be easy to pickup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-07T13:20:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760636#M1005261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my organization we have a pix515e. We want to buy a failover pix, but now they recommend us to put away our pix and buy an ASA. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you tell me what are the differences between ASA and PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the configuration a bit the same on both platforms? With my knowledge of pix, can I configure an ASA too? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760636#M1005261</guid>
      <dc:creator>beheerggd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:09:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760637#M1005263</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella, with your knowledge of PIX 515e you should be able to quickly learn the new ASA plaform, personaly I have not used the ASA but rather PIX515e and 501s, I bought a ASA  book with the intend to learn what I currently support in which shows command syntax for both the PIX500s and ASA, the CLI is same,  but It is obious as in any new platform that we are face with new CLI and  features to learn,  the ASA is the next generation for cisco's security applience ASA's functionality is far more widen that that of PIX500s in addition to new functions that you have to learn, since you know the PIX500's here are couple of links to compare to with ASAs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are couple of links to refer to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA models comparison&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Migrating from PIX 500 to ASA &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_brochure_list.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_brochure_list.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 12:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760637#M1005263</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-06T12:05:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760638#M1005267</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply. The links you send me are very helpfull. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 10:22:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760638#M1005267</guid>
      <dc:creator>beheerggd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-07T10:22:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760639#M1005275</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are several changes in the ASA CLI that you should be aware (but not afraid) of.  The interface configuration is more IOS like now.  Also, vpn's are configured a little differently using the concept of groups.  I know PIX 7.x will accept old style vpn commands and automagically convert them, but I don't know if the ASA has this logic.  Also, the 7.x no longer supports conduits in either PIX or ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fixup commands have been deprecated in the 7.x OS, in favor of inspection maps (again, more IOS like syntax).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These examples scratch the surface of the differences, but are most likely the ones you will first encounter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short though, if you know PIX 6.x (or 7.x), the ASA should be easy to pickup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760639#M1005275</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-07T13:20:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: comparing ASA with PIX (pix 515E)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760640#M1005277</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steven!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stella&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 05:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/comparing-asa-with-pix-pix-515e/m-p/760640#M1005277</guid>
      <dc:creator>beheerggd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-08T05:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

