<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACL in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/acl/m-p/3301463#M1005330</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;No, there is only one ACL per interface and direction. But this ACL can have multiple ACEs (Access List Entries) for different Traffic. There is no need to differentiate that in multiple ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2017 09:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-24T09:05:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/acl/m-p/3301437#M1005327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can i apply 2 ACLs for&amp;nbsp; inbound direction in fa 0/0 . one for tcp and other for udp ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/acl/m-p/3301437#M1005327</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonk34567</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/acl/m-p/3301463#M1005330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, there is only one ACL per interface and direction. But this ACL can have multiple ACEs (Access List Entries) for different Traffic. There is no need to differentiate that in multiple ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2017 09:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/acl/m-p/3301463#M1005330</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karsten Iwen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-24T09:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

