<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT with official IP on DMZ in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-with-official-ip-on-dmz/m-p/727618#M1005534</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pascal &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an example lets say your DMZ addressing is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;212.73.45.0/28 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on your pix firewall &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,outside) 212.73.45.0 212.73.45.0 netmask 255.255.255.240 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the ISP routes these addresses to your pix external interface you should have no problem. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-01T10:10:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT with official IP on DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-with-official-ip-on-dmz/m-p/727617#M1005533</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a PIX 515E (Ver.6.3.1)with three interfaces. Now I d'like to activate the DMZ interface with a official IP-address range.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Between the internel and outside interface is a NAT (PAT) configuration active. No, I have problems to configure the NAT for the DMZ interface. With the official IP-adresses on the DMZ, it is not necessary to make NAT. I d'like to configure a simple routing between the internal to DMZ and between the ouside to DMZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How I is the NAT configuration for the a DMZ with official IP-adresse?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pascal &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:07:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-with-official-ip-on-dmz/m-p/727617#M1005533</guid>
      <dc:creator>keynet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:07:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT with official IP on DMZ</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-with-official-ip-on-dmz/m-p/727618#M1005534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Pascal &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an example lets say your DMZ addressing is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;212.73.45.0/28 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on your pix firewall &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ,outside) 212.73.45.0 212.73.45.0 netmask 255.255.255.240 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the ISP routes these addresses to your pix external interface you should have no problem. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-with-official-ip-on-dmz/m-p/727618#M1005534</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T10:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

