<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Same network one PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-network-one-pix/m-p/727541#M1005536</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alain &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your diagram has come out a little bit funny but if i understand correctly you need static statements for your 2 proxy servers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ie &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.90.10 192.168.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.90.20 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You don't need individual routes for your internal proxy addresses. If the pix internal interface is not on the 192.168.0.0/24 network then you just need one route &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 "next hop" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope i have understood correctly. If not please let me know. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-01T10:06:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Same network one PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-network-one-pix/m-p/727540#M1005535</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;       SEGMENT LAN &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  192.168.0.10           192.168.0.20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   PROXYI                 PROXYII&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  192.168.190.10         192.168.190.20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;             192.168.190.250&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;              PIX 506&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;               INTERNET &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like that the traffic crossing by 192.168.0.10 Internet returns towards 192.168.0.10  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example routes inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0 192.168.0.10!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I would like that the traffic crossing by 192.168.0.20 Internet returns towards 192.168.0.20 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example routes inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0 192.168.0.20!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which is the best configuration &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alain&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-network-one-pix/m-p/727540#M1005535</guid>
      <dc:creator>bouthinon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:07:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Same network one PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-network-one-pix/m-p/727541#M1005536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alain &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your diagram has come out a little bit funny but if i understand correctly you need static statements for your 2 proxy servers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ie &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.90.10 192.168.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.90.20 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You don't need individual routes for your internal proxy addresses. If the pix internal interface is not on the 192.168.0.0/24 network then you just need one route &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route inside 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 "next hop" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope i have understood correctly. If not please let me know. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/same-network-one-pix/m-p/727541#M1005536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-01T10:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

