<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic hi Marvin, in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096860#M1005840</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hi Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Was trying to find a way of bringing a post to your attention so forgive me for appearing to hijack this thread!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;will an Firepower appliance (8150) allocate resources based on the security zones (mapped to interfaces)? Or does it do it some other way&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If a sensor (in passive mode) is receiving two halves of network communication on separate interfaces on that same sensor, will it automatically reconcile them into full conversations for the purposes of inspection? Would those interfaces need to be in the same security zone as well? We have some asymmetric routing issues we are trying to cope with but the sensor in question is receiving the full session information albeit on separate interfaces&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;any help would be greatly appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rsl_ukpros</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-09T14:10:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firepower Memory Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096858#M1005838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am using Firepower 6.2.0, I want to increase the RAM for it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How we can do. Firepower is configured in FMC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096858#M1005838</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashutosh.joshi1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T13:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You cannot change the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096859#M1005839</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You cannot change the allocated RAM for a Firepower module. It is fixed by the OS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096859#M1005839</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-29T14:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hi Marvin,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096860#M1005840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi Marvin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Was trying to find a way of bringing a post to your attention so forgive me for appearing to hijack this thread!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;will an Firepower appliance (8150) allocate resources based on the security zones (mapped to interfaces)? Or does it do it some other way&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If a sensor (in passive mode) is receiving two halves of network communication on separate interfaces on that same sensor, will it automatically reconcile them into full conversations for the purposes of inspection? Would those interfaces need to be in the same security zone as well? We have some asymmetric routing issues we are trying to cope with but the sensor in question is receiving the full session information albeit on separate interfaces&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;any help would be greatly appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096860#M1005840</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsl_ukpros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-09T14:10:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>@rsl_ukpros  </title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096861#M1005841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/users/rsl_ukpros"&gt;rsl_ukpros&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. I don't know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. I don't think it knows to stitch the pieces together in that scenario but I'm not 100% sure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 15:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096861#M1005841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-09T15:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks for the quick response</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096862#M1005842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 15:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-memory-utilization/m-p/3096862#M1005842</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsl_ukpros</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-09T15:50:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

