topic Re: Cisco ASA - 2 Site to Site routes needed for failover -Is po in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952186#M1007785 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Not helpful. Anything a bit more specific?</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:25:10 GMT jdod 2008-06-04T17:25:10Z Cisco ASA - 2 Site to Site routes needed for failover -Is possible? https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952184#M1007780 <P>3 physical sites. 2 ASA 5510 (routing mode_). 3rd site is in between ASA sites. 2 different connections. Depending on which link goes down, a certain set of Network Lists for Site to Site VPN is needed to place the 3rd site subnets where they belong depending on which link dies. The tunnels all work. Here is my wonder: Can I automate this somehow in my environment (all Cisco 3750/3560/2960) so that I can leave both tunnels in place so that if either link dies, the appropriate tunnel is picked for failover? Running 8.03 code on ASA. Using EIGRP (love that protocol). Anyone have any ideas?</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:02:27 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952184#M1007780 jdod 2020-02-21T10:02:27Z Re: Cisco ASA - 2 Site to Site routes needed for failover -Is po https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952185#M1007783 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>You can implement failover or loadbalancing . Use this configuration examples for your configurations.</P><P><A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/tsd_products_support_configure.html" target="_blank">http://cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/tsd_products_support_configure.html</A></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:57:58 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952185#M1007783 owillins 2008-06-04T15:57:58Z Re: Cisco ASA - 2 Site to Site routes needed for failover -Is po https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952186#M1007785 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Not helpful. Anything a bit more specific?</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:25:10 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-asa-2-site-to-site-routes-needed-for-failover-is-possible/m-p/952186#M1007785 jdod 2008-06-04T17:25:10Z