<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780089#M1008330</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;User 100.5.7.47 hits staic site to site access-lists but now won't hit Global PAT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Global PAT for Internet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 10 192.252.127.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 10 100.5.7.0 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site to Site #1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-to-host1 permit ip host 100.5.7.47 host 100.79.104.187&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.252.127.241 access-list host-to-host1 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site to Site #2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-to-host2 permit ip host 100.5.7.47 host 100.200.251.110&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 206.112.159.32 access-list host-to-host2 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DOUG KIRK</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-03T16:05:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780087#M1008325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a global pat for a clients subnet to access the internet and a static nat for a specific host to host connection accross a site to site vpn.  I recently added another static nat w/ access list and now the host can't access the internet.  The client hits the static access-lists but it never hits the global pat for the internet.  I have a pix 525 running 6.3.3 Any thoughts as to why this is happening?  I cant reproduce this effect in the lab.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780087#M1008325</guid>
      <dc:creator>DOUG KIRK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:55:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780088#M1008327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you post the config and the ip address of client in Question..?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:51:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780088#M1008327</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-03T15:51:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780089#M1008330</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;User 100.5.7.47 hits staic site to site access-lists but now won't hit Global PAT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Global PAT for Internet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 10 192.252.127.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 10 100.5.7.0 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site to Site #1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-to-host1 permit ip host 100.5.7.47 host 100.79.104.187&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.252.127.241 access-list host-to-host1 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Site to Site #2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-to-host2 permit ip host 100.5.7.47 host 100.200.251.110&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 206.112.159.32 access-list host-to-host2 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780089#M1008330</guid>
      <dc:creator>DOUG KIRK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-03T16:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780090#M1008331</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah yes.  You bring back good memories doug &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are running into bug CSCec63822.  It was resolved in 6.3(3.136) and later.  There is no workaround other than upgrading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS&amp;gt; Please don't foget to mork the issue resolved if it solves your problem so we can check this issue off the list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780090#M1008331</guid>
      <dc:creator>David White</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-04T02:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780091#M1008333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info.  I have found a workaround until we can upgrade code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a new policy NAT for this specific host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-pat deny ip host 100.5.7.47 host&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;x.x.x.x &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-pat deny ip host 100.5.7.47 host y.y.y.y &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list host-pat permit ip host 100.5.7.47 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 10 access-list host-pat 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This took care of my problem for the time being.  We are scheduling a time to upgrade code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780091#M1008333</guid>
      <dc:creator>DOUG KIRK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-04T11:53:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PIX Nat/Pat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780092#M1008335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Doug,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Be careful with the workaround, as 'deny' statements are not supported in policy-nat.  So, your results may be unpredictable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, at least it is working for the time being &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:06:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-nat-pat-issue/m-p/780092#M1008335</guid>
      <dc:creator>David White</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-04T13:06:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

