<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CPU 100% during FTP in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734413#M1009230</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue with my Pix, during an FTP transfer the CPU goes upto 100% and stays there during the period of the transfer. When the transfer ends it goes back to 0%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pix is a 535 with 512MB, the two interfaces transfering the data are both gigabit and are running at gigabit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only connection in the 'sh conn' is the one in progress the FTP so its not being hammered from all over yet the CPU spikes upto 100% and stays there then drops back to 0%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This started because the server guys were complaining about slow transfers and were pointing at the FW, i didnt think for a second that one transfer would cause a Pix 535 with gigabit interfaces to flatline like it does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there something obvious wrong ? or something i could do to identify the problem or a workaround ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any input would be great, much head scratching going on here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stuart.jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:52:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734413#M1009230</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue with my Pix, during an FTP transfer the CPU goes upto 100% and stays there during the period of the transfer. When the transfer ends it goes back to 0%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Pix is a 535 with 512MB, the two interfaces transfering the data are both gigabit and are running at gigabit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only connection in the 'sh conn' is the one in progress the FTP so its not being hammered from all over yet the CPU spikes upto 100% and stays there then drops back to 0%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This started because the server guys were complaining about slow transfers and were pointing at the FW, i didnt think for a second that one transfer would cause a Pix 535 with gigabit interfaces to flatline like it does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there something obvious wrong ? or something i could do to identify the problem or a workaround ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any input would be great, much head scratching going on here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734413#M1009230</guid>
      <dc:creator>stuart.jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:52:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734414#M1009232</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Stuart,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Certainly we need to look into this. A single connection should ideally not spike the CPU to 100% and keep it constantly there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First off, Id like to know if any changes were made on PIX due the complain from the server guys for slow transfer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What code is running on PIX? Is it possible to take output of "show proc", "sh cpu usage" &amp;amp; "sh mem" just before the start of FTP transfer and then during the FTP transfer. Try keeing the time difference between the two outputs to 10-15 seconds. This might tell us which process is actually consuming CPU so much. Also, if you could provide the "sh interface" and "show run" output, it would be of great help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734414#M1009232</guid>
      <dc:creator>vitripat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-27T04:27:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734415#M1009233</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you are seeing is basically a sort of DOS attack. The server guys must be using a third party software to do the FTP. That software must be opening simenltaneous streams to do the ftp...just like a download acclerator. When the ftp process is going on and see the output of show conn count. If the current and the maximum values are almost same then it is a DOS attack..maybe not an intentional dos attack. Possibly you should try to limit the number of connections that the server guys can open..this you can do if you have a self static in place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zubair&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734415#M1009233</guid>
      <dc:creator>zubairjalal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-27T09:38:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734416#M1009234</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zubair,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is an output of the sh conn when i had the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------------ show conn count ------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 in use, 198 most used&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So i dont think it ties in with your description.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734416#M1009234</guid>
      <dc:creator>stuart.jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-27T21:57:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734417#M1009236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;at least give us the info of version you are running on FW..??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734417#M1009236</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T00:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734418#M1009244</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No changes have been made to the Pix that i am aware of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am unable to get snapshot until the next transfer is run, but attached is output from when the situation was occurring.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps, will get a snapshot of status before next transfer and during as you suggested when i can.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734418#M1009244</guid>
      <dc:creator>stuart.jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T01:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734419#M1009255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;heyy Stuart..i missed the output that you posted earlier..now I see you are running 6.3.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has the issue been there right from day one.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is the issue only with "FTP" transfers ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when the ftp transfer is complete does the cpu usage go down to normal ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any IP Audit commands configured on the fw ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is one  more things that I notice that the broadcasts on your inside Interface &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;997532413 packets input, 11075500019630 bytes, 6271442 no buffer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	Received 106715356 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently the Broadcasts are  around 10%... the above is an instantanious value...which might go up if the Broadcast storm is heavy ...and this would definitely help us to shoot up the cycles..:-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734419#M1009255</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T03:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734420#M1009260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;abinjola,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure i believe it might have but has only been highlighted to me in the last few days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure about the FTP transfer either though i did check last night when there were 24 connection and the CPU was only around 60%, though the transfers last night were not going through the two gig interfaces, it was just using one of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for the CPU usage returning to normal yes, please see the snapshot of the PDM i posted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hadnt noticed the broadcasts i will keep an eye on that, i was worried about the 'no buffers'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734420#M1009260</guid>
      <dc:creator>stuart.jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T03:36:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU 100% during FTP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734421#M1009264</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cool..24 connections and CPU was still 60 %......that too without tunnels ...no failover..no SNMP..dont ya think its still high..?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other thing that I noticed in the sh proc is that the these processes are consuming too much of run time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i82543_timer &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;557poll are interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1942469178 0567401c 6252/8192 pix/intf0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;now the i82543_timer and the 557poll are interface  card's driver polling threads corresponding two types of interfaces in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your pix 535: gb-ethernet (i82543) and ethernet (i82559&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Soo much of broadcast again supports this explanation...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how much of CPU would you think is normal ? or in the pleasant days how much CPU usage did you observe ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any ways to control this traffic and secondly how feasible is it for you to upgrade to 6.3.5 (to rule out the possibility of any bug hitting us )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:12:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-100-during-ftp/m-p/734421#M1009264</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T04:12:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

