<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FWSM transparent, multiple context mode in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707830#M1009480</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to implement a design with FWSM  routing between VRFs, each MPLS VRF has multiple VLANs assigned to it. So, I am trying to put multiple VLANs on inside and multiple on outiside interface of each context without bridge-groups.Is it possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lganeva</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:50:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM transparent, multiple context mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707830#M1009480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to implement a design with FWSM  routing between VRFs, each MPLS VRF has multiple VLANs assigned to it. So, I am trying to put multiple VLANs on inside and multiple on outiside interface of each context without bridge-groups.Is it possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707830#M1009480</guid>
      <dc:creator>lganeva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM transparent, multiple context mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707831#M1009481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason for transparent mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707831#M1009481</guid>
      <dc:creator>astroman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-23T19:42:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM transparent, multiple context mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707832#M1009483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it is possible with 3.1 code. You can have upto 8 pairs of interfaces (i.e 8 bridge groups)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707832#M1009483</guid>
      <dc:creator>varakantam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-25T08:56:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM transparent, multiple context mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707833#M1009484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you don't want to use bridge-groups then no i don't think this is possible. You could only do it with each context in routed mode but it doesn't sound like this is what you want. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707833#M1009484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-25T11:00:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM transparent, multiple context mode</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707834#M1009486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just one more question then. If i use a point-to-point link with SVI on the MSFC is it possible to pass this traffic through the firewall?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lora&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:11:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-transparent-multiple-context-mode/m-p/707834#M1009486</guid>
      <dc:creator>lganeva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-27T11:11:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

