<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: adding more than one global inside in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741537#M1012459</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a bit concerned using that since I already have an access-list nonat and aslo have nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current access-list nonat is used for the existing L-2-L that we have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tshi M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-28T12:51:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>adding more than one global inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741535#M1012455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We need to establish two site-to-site VPN sessions with different vendors. The problem is that each vendor is requesting us to use a specific IP range that they are providing to us and want us to statically NAT static (inside,outside) each worstation on our side that will connect to their network. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am relunctant to do this because the config will become cumbersome but I might have to do it anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the first time I have this type of request and was wondering if I can use global (inside) for each private network that we will connect to? Example is attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also have some site-to-site VPNs that don't require this type of setting &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:52:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741535#M1012455</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tshi M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:52:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding more than one global inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741536#M1012456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The easiest way to get this done, in my opinion, would be to use the static command in your policy nat. Lets say that your internal network is 172.16.1.0/24 and they want you to show up as 192.168.5.0/24. We'll also say the remote network you're trying to reach is 10.15.15.0/24. In that case, you would do something like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list policy_nat permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.15.15.0 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 192.168.5.0 access-list policy_nat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will translate your network to the desired network only when you try to reach the remote network across the VPN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bryan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741536#M1012456</guid>
      <dc:creator>bthibode</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T00:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding more than one global inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741537#M1012459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a bit concerned using that since I already have an access-list nonat and aslo have nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current access-list nonat is used for the existing L-2-L that we have.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741537#M1012459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tshi M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-28T12:51:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: adding more than one global inside</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741538#M1012462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This posting was helpful since it leads me to my solution. However, the goal was to do a one on one static nat translation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:41:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/adding-more-than-one-global-inside/m-p/741538#M1012462</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tshi M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-12T16:41:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

