<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA Active/Active Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809429#M1022496</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN's are still unsupported in multiple context mode in 8.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-22T13:40:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Active/Active Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809425#M1022492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My question goes into the VPN world.  I've read when in active/active config the ASA's do not support vpn/ipsec tunnel failover.  My question is does it support IPSEC/VPN's at all in active/active?  I mean i realize they may not failover but if I don't care if they are down can i terminate them to 1 or is it just not possible to use VPN/IPSEC with an ASA active/active setup?  Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809425#M1022492</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian.stamper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Active/Active Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809426#M1022493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi sorry vpn cannot be configured on the active/active setup. it does not support for vpns on failover setup u need to configure active/standy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sebastan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809426#M1022493</guid>
      <dc:creator>sebastan_bach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-09T13:23:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Active/Active Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809427#M1022494</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In active / standby mode, would I use the track command to set up the 2nd [failover] vpn tunnel?  I'm assuming the 2nd ISP would plug into another VLAN port on the ASA and once tracking failed, a new tunnel would be negotiated.  Yes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809427#M1022494</guid>
      <dc:creator>netsec123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-11T03:26:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Active/Active Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809428#M1022495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that version 8.x of the ASA supports Active/Active VPN failover.  I looked quickly and couldn't find the notes on this, but I know that this is something I asked about in the past and was told 8.x will support this.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809428#M1022495</guid>
      <dc:creator>ddidier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-22T13:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Active/Active Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809429#M1022496</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN's are still unsupported in multiple context mode in 8.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/contexts.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 13:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-active-active-question/m-p/809429#M1022496</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-22T13:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

