<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firewall failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694389#M1024259</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Faiz,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you have two UR license firewall, you can&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run them in Active/Active if you like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you decide to make it Active/Standby, get&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a FO firewall, it is much cheaper.  But &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active/Standby configuration will work with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;both UR firewalls but you're wasting your money.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE Security&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>daviddtran</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-05T14:04:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694385#M1024249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have 2 UR licenses for primary Firewall, can I make one of them as Failover. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:48:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694385#M1024249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Faiz Mohiuddin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-13T00:48:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694386#M1024250</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes.  you just need to designate one of them as standby in the config if you are doing lan based failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 19:34:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694386#M1024250</guid>
      <dc:creator>jserevitch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-04T19:34:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694387#M1024251</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Justin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will make the other as standby and test them if it works fine. Is there any special configs for that or same as usual. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Faiz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694387#M1024251</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Faiz Mohiuddin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T05:58:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694388#M1024254</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configs should be the same as if the second pix was failover only.  The following link from cisco will aid you in the config of a lan.  The biggest thing to keep in mind is that the two pix must be identical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800eb72f.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800eb72f.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694388#M1024254</guid>
      <dc:creator>jserevitch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T13:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694389#M1024259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Faiz,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you have two UR license firewall, you can&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run them in Active/Active if you like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you decide to make it Active/Standby, get&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a FO firewall, it is much cheaper.  But &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active/Standby configuration will work with&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;both UR firewalls but you're wasting your money.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE Security&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-failover/m-p/694389#M1024259</guid>
      <dc:creator>daviddtran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-05T14:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

