<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Object grouping: This config look right? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683046#M1024431</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it looks fine. You can use it as such &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl_in permit tcp object-group VENDOR host 172.16.5.1 eq 23 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-01T21:28:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683045#M1024430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Alright...powering through ASA 101. I just want to confirm THIS will work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to create a object-group with some IP's so I can make my ACL list more readable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here it is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conf t&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group network VENDOR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;descriptiong Vendor IP Address range&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network object host 192.16.5.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network object host 192.16.5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and so forth. I have 7 IP addresses to add.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the end, when I put all the IP address in,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;write terminal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683045#M1024430</guid>
      <dc:creator>thecoffeeguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683046#M1024431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it looks fine. You can use it as such &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list acl_in permit tcp object-group VENDOR host 172.16.5.1 eq 23 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683046#M1024431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-01T21:28:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683047#M1024432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to be sure, so i didn't blow something up on the ASA. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This may sound silly, but once I make the changes, to they automatically get written to RAM? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would I need to do a "write" to get into NVRAM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, even though I am creating this object now, it is not going to be applied just yet. Is that ok? Will it not go into effect until I put it into a ACL?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683047#M1024432</guid>
      <dc:creator>thecoffeeguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-01T21:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683048#M1024433</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;two quick things...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes, you need to write mem to save the object-group into the config and...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no, it will not affect the ACL...assuming that you have actuallt created a new, unused object-group... i only say that because I have seen people think they were creating a new object group bu they were actually changing an existing object group...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just check a head of time that the object group name that you want to use is not already being used...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683048#M1024433</guid>
      <dc:creator>joe-martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-01T23:28:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683049#M1024434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Got it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'write mem' best way to save?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the object-group, I made sure the name was not being used previously. All set and GTG there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683049#M1024434</guid>
      <dc:creator>thecoffeeguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-01T23:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683050#M1024435</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One other thing I forgot to mention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When looking at the config, after I entered the objects, I am wondering if I forgot to put the netmask.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network-object host 104.50.25.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should it be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network-object host 104.50.25.5 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to match that IP explicitly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would think so.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best way to correct this? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683050#M1024435</guid>
      <dc:creator>thecoffeeguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-02T00:18:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683051#M1024436</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the "host" keyword tells it that you are defining a specific host rather than a subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you could essentially configure it as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network-object 104.50.255.5 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or the shorter/better way:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;network-object host 104.50.255.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe Martin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683051#M1024436</guid>
      <dc:creator>joe-martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-02T01:20:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Object grouping: This config look right?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683052#M1024437</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Got it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/object-grouping-this-config-look-right/m-p/683052#M1024437</guid>
      <dc:creator>thecoffeeguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-02T01:24:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

