topic Static NAT translation in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612981#M1027432 <P>I have a Cisco 1811 router that will be terminating an ISP connection. There will be no VPN tunnel configured. Is it possible to configure one static NAT translation that will be plugged into the switch ports on the 1811 and the other devices plugged in here to not be NAT'd? Basically, I am wondering if when you configure one static NAT translation that the other hosts need to be NAT'd or can they remain completely separate?</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:26:47 GMT mark.blanchfield 2019-03-11T09:26:47Z Static NAT translation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612981#M1027432 <P>I have a Cisco 1811 router that will be terminating an ISP connection. There will be no VPN tunnel configured. Is it possible to configure one static NAT translation that will be plugged into the switch ports on the 1811 and the other devices plugged in here to not be NAT'd? Basically, I am wondering if when you configure one static NAT translation that the other hosts need to be NAT'd or can they remain completely separate?</P> Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:26:47 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612981#M1027432 mark.blanchfield 2019-03-11T09:26:47Z Re: Static NAT translation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612982#M1027434 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>They can remain separate. You can define a static NAT for something like a mail or web server. Then you can have everything else NAT from a pool or use PAT.</P><P></P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:31:50 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612982#M1027434 jcrussell 2007-01-31T16:31:50Z Re: Static NAT translation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612983#M1027436 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Is it possible for the other hosts to not be NAT's at all? I guess the question is if you configure a static translation, does this enable NAT globally or can you still leave other hosts as they are and not NAT them? Thanks for the response.</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:35:54 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612983#M1027436 mark.blanchfield 2007-01-31T16:35:54Z Re: Static NAT translation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612984#M1027437 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>You should be able to leave them with their original addresses. Of course, they will need to use public addresses if they want to connect to the internet.</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:43:46 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612984#M1027437 jcrussell 2007-01-31T16:43:46Z Re: Static NAT translation https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612985#M1027438 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Ok. That is what I thought but wanted to make sure. Thanks again for your responses.</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:46:53 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-translation/m-p/612985#M1027438 mark.blanchfield 2007-01-31T16:46:53Z