<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ASA vs PIX software feature comparison in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610734#M1027459</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi to all, i'm looking for a document about  software feature comparison between pix and asa not related to any hardware module.I know asa can do IPS and anti-x with the appropriate module, but what i'm looking is the software differences between asa and pix platform .For example, i know asa is webvpn capable, and pix not.Is this the only differences ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks to all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Massimiliano Tognon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:26:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA vs PIX software feature comparison</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610734#M1027459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi to all, i'm looking for a document about  software feature comparison between pix and asa not related to any hardware module.I know asa can do IPS and anti-x with the appropriate module, but what i'm looking is the software differences between asa and pix platform .For example, i know asa is webvpn capable, and pix not.Is this the only differences ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks to all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Max&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610734#M1027459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Massimiliano Tognon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA vs PIX software feature comparison</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610735#M1027461</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Max,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA seems to be more application oriented than PIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As well, you are right, SSL is the big difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that for ASA to support SSL users you need a special licence for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1ddaf25f" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&amp;amp;CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1ddaf25f&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate if this helped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610735#M1027461</guid>
      <dc:creator>5220</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-31T09:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA vs PIX software feature comparison</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610736#M1027463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found a link with a feature license explanation for all license for asa and pix, and with all the information everyone is able to make a comparison. The differences between pix and asa on software are Webvpn and vpn load balancing (support for asa 5520 and greater).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can find all the information at this link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008064093e.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008064093e.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rate if you find ok&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-vs-pix-software-feature-comparison/m-p/610736#M1027463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Massimiliano Tognon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-05T15:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

