<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628610#M1028934</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to post the results of "show crypto ipsec sa"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-16T20:10:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628606#M1028930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is my configuration - per-se &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet0 auto &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet1 auto &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface ethernet2 auto &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet0 outside security0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet1 inside security100 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nameif ethernet2 DMZ security4 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_access_in permit ip any 2XX.XXX.XXX.0 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list ITS_splitTunnelAcl permit ip 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 any &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 ATL 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 1XX.0.1.0 255.255.255.XXX &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 1XX.0.2.0 255.255.255.XXX &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl permit ip any LAX 255.255.255.XXX &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_20 permit ip 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 ATL 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IP address outside 2XX.XXX.XXX.0 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 1XX.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no ip address DMZ &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip local pool Here 1XX.0.1.1-1XX.0.1.50 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip local pool There 1XX.0.2.1-1XX.0.2.10 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip local pool LAX 1XX.201.1.1-1XX.201.1.5 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 2XX.XXX.XXX.XXX &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_outbound_nat0_acl &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 1XX.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group outside_access_in in interface outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2XX.XXX.XXX.XXX 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;: end &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my dilemna is this: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. I need to have two sets of outside (internet) IPs to be able to access the same network and servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. I have 2 PIXs. My original PIX 515E and another PIX 501.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Presently the PIX 515E is working fine. The PIX 501 has the same configuration but a different inside IP and DHCP pool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. When I attempt to put a route statement on either PIX, I get a response that the route is already there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I attempt to use the PIX 501 I cannot access the original network or even see it, however I can access the internet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX 515E cannot access the PIX 501 or even see it. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The VPN on both PIXs work, however the PIX 501 allows you to get to the inside of the PIX but not to the network. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:19:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628606#M1028930</guid>
      <dc:creator>fbwomack1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:19:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628607#M1028931</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Look at your crypto statisitics. I bet your only seeing one way being encypted. Post the results for us to see.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628607#M1028931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:20:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628608#M1028932</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 20 set transform-set ESP-DES-MD5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 40 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 40 set transform-set ESP-DES-MD5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 60 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_60&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto dynamic-map outside_dyn_map 60 set transform-set ESP-DES-MD5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map 20 ipsec-isakmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map 20 set peer 2XX.XXX.XXX.XXX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map 20 set transform-set ESP-DES-MD5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic outside_dyn_map&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;crypto map outside_map interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;isakmp enable outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PIX 515E is the gateway that will be used. I cannot change it as the entire network will go down that is why I am trying to test with the PIX 501 to ensure that my configuration is correct for when we change ISP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628608#M1028932</guid>
      <dc:creator>fbwomack1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-15T20:27:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628609#M1028933</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ddid the crypto mapping help out?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:05:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628609#M1028933</guid>
      <dc:creator>fbwomack1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T17:05:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628610#M1028934</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to post the results of "show crypto ipsec sa"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628610#M1028934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Collin Clark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T20:10:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using 2 PIXs to access same network</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628611#M1028935</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I dont have that statement or results for that request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-2-pixs-to-access-same-network/m-p/628611#M1028935</guid>
      <dc:creator>fbwomack1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-17T13:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

