<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside , in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3353926#M1029137</link>
    <description>I ll stick around. &lt;BR /&gt;I am back to ASAs after many years wandering on others vendor territory so: "see ya, next time".</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-23T13:38:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352307#M1029130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Guys&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have E-commerce server on the DMZ, needs to talk to DB server on inside&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;E-commerce = 172.16.1.100 on DMZ&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;DB = 192.168.1.100 on inside&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;is the below correct&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object network E-Commerce&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;host &lt;STRONG&gt;172.16.1.100&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;object network E-Commerce-Translated&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;host &lt;STRONG&gt;17.16.1.100&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nat (dmz,inside) static &lt;STRONG&gt;E-Commerce-Translated&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-list inside_acl permit tcp host 192.168.1.100 host 172.16.1.100 eq 81&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-group inside_acl in interface inside&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks all&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352307#M1029130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ibrahim Jamil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:32:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352359#M1029131</link>
      <description>I am not sure what's the role of NAT configuration you use:&lt;BR /&gt;nat (dmz,inside) static E-Commerce-Translated&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I believe pure FW access should be enough. So without NAT here's the FW config:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;access-list dmz_acl permit tcp host 172.16.1.100 host 192.168.1.100 eq the_port_number_you_need&lt;BR /&gt;access-group dmz_acl in interface dmz&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352359#M1029131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T13:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352535#M1029133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Florin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for ur time to answer my Thread&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;pls allow me to ask couple of questions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1)so in cisco ASA code 9.x , NAT isn't required for access from&lt;STRONG&gt; DMZ&lt;/STRONG&gt; to&lt;STRONG&gt; inside&lt;/STRONG&gt; as lower security interface try to access high security interface ????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) when do i need such below&lt;STRONG&gt; NAT&lt;/STRONG&gt; , I Mean when do we need to translate DMZ hosts to inside hosts:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nat (dmz,inside) static E-Commerce-Translated&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352535#M1029133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ibrahim Jamil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T17:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352923#M1029134</link>
      <description>1. I think you're confusing NAT for Firewall. NAT manipulates IP while FW grants or not access.&lt;BR /&gt;2. I would use NAT in scenarios where for example the DMZ machine has no default gateway. But we just diverge from your scenario.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did you tried my previous config update?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 07:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352923#M1029134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T07:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352960#M1029135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NAT Control is out of everything. No more mandatory NAT config on ASA for a very long time now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;BR /&gt;Octavian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:06:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3352960#M1029135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Octavian Szolga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T09:06:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3353837#M1029136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Florin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;kindly keep ur eyes on my future posts&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks all&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3353837#M1029136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ibrahim Jamil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-23T10:09:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and ACL Statment for DMZ access to inside ,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3353926#M1029137</link>
      <description>I ll stick around. &lt;BR /&gt;I am back to ASAs after many years wandering on others vendor territory so: "see ya, next time".</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-acl-statment-for-dmz-access-to-inside/m-p/3353926#M1029137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-23T13:38:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

