<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: intervlan communication on FWSM in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623834#M1036022</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think this is possible with FWSM. you might want to have two interfces with same seurity level talking to each other. though intervlan routing may not be an option with firewall else the firewall functionality might not be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can enable interfaces on the same security level to communicate with each other using "FWSM(config)# same-security-traffic permit inter-interface"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gagan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gagansethi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T23:38:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>intervlan communication on FWSM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623833#M1036008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Whcih command is used to enable intervlan comm. in FWSM?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623833#M1036008</guid>
      <dc:creator>aksher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: intervlan communication on FWSM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623834#M1036022</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think this is possible with FWSM. you might want to have two interfces with same seurity level talking to each other. though intervlan routing may not be an option with firewall else the firewall functionality might not be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can enable interfaces on the same security level to communicate with each other using "FWSM(config)# same-security-traffic permit inter-interface"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;gagan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623834#M1036022</guid>
      <dc:creator>gagansethi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-01T23:38:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: intervlan communication on FWSM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623835#M1036040</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi aksher,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;try this...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (HSV,LSV)LSV IP HSV IP nemask X.X.X.X.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;u might be knowing this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HSV - high secure vlan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LSV - low secure vlan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all the best.it should work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/intervlan-communication-on-fwsm/m-p/623835#M1036040</guid>
      <dc:creator>aryan1980</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-01T23:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

