<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple access-group on same interface? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618283#M1036125</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, this is not possible. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are you trying to achieve ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might using object groups :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800d641d.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800d641d.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sincerely&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Patrick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Iseli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-12-19T15:44:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618280#M1036097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to configure multiple access-group on same interface on PIX?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group ACL-IN-1 in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group ACL-IN-2 in interface outside &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:10:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618280#M1036097</guid>
      <dc:creator>tunemore1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:10:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618281#M1036105</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618281#M1036105</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2006-12-18T21:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618282#M1036116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, you can only have one access-group assigned per interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618282#M1036116</guid>
      <dc:creator>thult</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-19T10:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618283#M1036125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, this is not possible. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are you trying to achieve ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might using object groups :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800d641d.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800d641d.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sincerely&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Patrick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618283#M1036125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Iseli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-19T15:44:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618284#M1036130</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not on PIX version 6, you can only apply one in an inbound direction. On version 7 PIX you should be able to apply one access list inbound and one access list outbound on the same interface in the same way you can on IOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618284#M1036130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andy Robinson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-19T16:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618285#M1036133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When asking questions, always specify which version of code you are using.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can apply access-lists inbound and outbound on an interface in 7.x code.  6.x code only allows inbound.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addition, you can also specify a service policy that can be applied either globally, or specifically to interfaces, and you can do things with the traffic there, as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gave AndyR0binson some points because he was correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Jason&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate this message if it solved some or all of your issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/618285#M1036133</guid>
      <dc:creator>jgervia_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-20T03:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/3399453#M1036135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know what you mean , i had the same problem but i have solved it with a standard ACL&lt;BR /&gt;just make a one standard ACL with multi ACL's&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;example&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;r1# conf t&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;10 ip access-list standard JUST-EXAMPLE&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;20 deny host 176.16.1.130&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;30 deny 176.16.1.192 0.0.0.15&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;40 access-list 10 permit 176.16.0.0 0.0.0.255&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;50 permit any&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;succes!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:22:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/3399453#M1036135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laith_IQ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-14T13:22:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple access-group on same interface?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/3399488#M1036136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes esssentially one extended ACL comnprised of a number of statements. only one can be assigned to a single if. at a time&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:11:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multiple-access-group-on-same-interface/m-p/3399488#M1036136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Mink</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-14T14:11:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

