<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NAT and Encryption in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-encryption/m-p/685967#M1036825</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We allow clients to connect to us over BT Radianz.  One client is refusing to use our services as the traffic is not encrypted.  At the moment we tell BT Radianz the internal IP of a server clients can connect to.  The give us a global address that the client targets.  So NAT is in operation here.  In orde to satify the clients requirements for encryption, is there a way to encrypt the payload of the packet without affecting the way the packets are NAT'ed/routed within the service providers cloud?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be rated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gavin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gavin.mckee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:58:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAT and Encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-encryption/m-p/685967#M1036825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We allow clients to connect to us over BT Radianz.  One client is refusing to use our services as the traffic is not encrypted.  At the moment we tell BT Radianz the internal IP of a server clients can connect to.  The give us a global address that the client targets.  So NAT is in operation here.  In orde to satify the clients requirements for encryption, is there a way to encrypt the payload of the packet without affecting the way the packets are NAT'ed/routed within the service providers cloud?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be rated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gavin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-encryption/m-p/685967#M1036825</guid>
      <dc:creator>gavin.mckee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T08:58:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NAT and Encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-encryption/m-p/685968#M1036838</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are most probably looking for a VPN solution. However, if the clients are connecting only for telnet/ftp, you can enable Secure Shell.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-and-encryption/m-p/685968#M1036838</guid>
      <dc:creator>rais</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-20T15:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

