<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic using two seperate subnets on PIX in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-two-seperate-subnets-on-pix/m-p/689289#M1036956</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;is it ok to use two seperate subnets for NAT purpose? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually it is at one of our new clients.. this is something totally new i have seen....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address outside 67.88.68.198 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 63.209.42.168 netmask 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 67.88.68.199 netmask 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 67.88.68.193 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>charan_jeetsingh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:07:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using two seperate subnets on PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-two-seperate-subnets-on-pix/m-p/689289#M1036956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;is it ok to use two seperate subnets for NAT purpose? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually it is at one of our new clients.. this is something totally new i have seen....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address outside 67.88.68.198 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 63.209.42.168 netmask 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 67.88.68.199 netmask 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 67.88.68.193 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-two-seperate-subnets-on-pix/m-p/689289#M1036956</guid>
      <dc:creator>charan_jeetsingh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T09:07:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using two seperate subnets on PIX</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-two-seperate-subnets-on-pix/m-p/689290#M1036970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. do you have any vpn setup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. what's the acl saying&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:21:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/using-two-seperate-subnets-on-pix/m-p/689290#M1036970</guid>
      <dc:creator>zulqurnain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-12T16:21:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

