<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Great idea. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885002#M1038223</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-22T20:30:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Feedback: add Object suppression threshold etc</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885001#M1038215</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Feedback for new version:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When editing IPS rules via Firepower management center and you want to suppress an IPS rule for a IP or Subnet we think it's better also have the opportunity to chose an existing Object-Group of IP addresses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Proxy provider which has 5 subnets containing proxy servers, then adds one new subnet, then we simply add that subnet to the Object-Group and the IPS rule is than also suppressed for that IP subnet. Otherwise you have to check all the rules again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also perhaps a feedback button like in Cisco Prime would be nice &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; to give feedback directly from management center. We are now using 6.0.0.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885001#M1038215</guid>
      <dc:creator>bolsiusint1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-12T12:54:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Great idea.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885002#M1038223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great idea.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885002#M1038223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Bell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-22T20:30:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'm seconding this. I have</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885003#M1038233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm seconding this. I have specific networks I don't care about logging but still need to be inspected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/feedback-add-object-suppression-threshold-etc/m-p/2885003#M1038233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jared Burton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-28T22:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

