<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Static NAT Question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218656#M1047560</link>
    <description>Ok, you can see if rule is used with show xlate and show conn.&lt;BR /&gt;The nat rule is allowing traffic to go through the firewall without translating the traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also test this with packet tracer or do a packet capture.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;br, Micke</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikael.lahtela</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-17T23:53:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218595#M1047521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I found this static NAT, can someone help me explain why it's pointed to the same IP?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) 10.17.1.10 10.17.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218595#M1047521</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Rener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T14:46:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218627#M1047536</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would guess that is used to exempt traffic going to/from a vpn tunnel.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;br, Micke</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218627#M1047536</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikael.lahtela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T22:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218650#M1047551</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mikael,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We do not use VPN though.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218650#M1047551</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Rener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T23:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218656#M1047560</link>
      <description>Ok, you can see if rule is used with show xlate and show conn.&lt;BR /&gt;The nat rule is allowing traffic to go through the firewall without translating the traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also test this with packet tracer or do a packet capture.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;br, Micke</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 23:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-question/m-p/3218656#M1047560</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikael.lahtela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T23:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

